New START to Expire: Nuclear Arms Control Goes Up in Smoke
With New START’s expiration in February 2026, the US and Russia will have no legally binding constraints on their nuclear arsenals.
With New START’s expiration in February 2026, the US and Russia will have no legally binding constraints on their nuclear arsenals.
The 2025 United States National Security Strategy (NSS) reflects a shift in how the US defines and pursues its national interests.
President Donald Trump’s interest in Greenland appears to be driven by a desire to secure US interests in the Arctic for long-term geostrategic and economic reasons.
Cooperation in the development of Advanced Undersea Systems was a common thread in India–US defence engagements in 2025.
Satellite imagery and expert analysis reveal significant expansion of nuclear testing sites in Russia, China and the US.
President Donald Trump has comprehensively restructured the US federal government’s role in regulating the development of artificial intelligence.
Donald Trump’s decision to resume US nuclear testing risks reigniting a competitive nuclear build-up that could destabilise international security.
The US SPEED Act 2025 illuminates how agile, outcome-based acquisition models can quicken defence procurement.
In the aftermath of the Cold War, the resurgence of Russia and the swift ascent of China have reignited an era of intense great power competition. The United States’ National Security Strategy 2017, which formally identified Russia and China as strategic competitors, marked a pivotal moment in the crystallization of this moment. The pursuit of technological supremacy is at the heart of the competition, with the US and China moving beyond bilateral disputes to exert global influence through alliance formation, setting technological standards, and competing for control in key regions like the Indo-Pacific, Southeast Asia, the Korean Peninsula, and South Asia. Bernard F. W. Loo and James Char’s Strategic Currents: China and US Competition for Influence presents a timely and empirically grounded analysis of the US–China strategic rivalry, with a particular emphasis on Southeast Asia’s adaptive responses within an increasingly contested international order.
The future of AUKUS after the Trump–Albanese meeting appears more secure than some feared but less specific than supporters hope.



