You are here

Begum Khaleda Zia`s Visit to India

Gautam Sen is a retired IDAS officer who has served in senior positions at the Centre and in a north-east State Government.
  • Share
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Linkedin
  • Print
  • October 29, 2012

    Begun Khaleda Zia, the leader of Bangladesh’s main opposition party, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), is visiting India after nearly six years at the invitation of the Indian government. Since her last visit in 2006 as Prime Minister of Bangladesh, there has been a substantial change in India-Bangladesh relations. Given the proximity of views on communal politics, their socio-cultural disposition and reckoning the historic background of affinity and cooperation between the Awami League of Bangladesh and the Congress Party of India, it was but natural that there would be an upturn in bilateral relations between the two countries with the Awami League and Begum Sheikh Hasina in power. But the Sheikh Hasina Government went even further in its approach towards India, as has been evident on a range of issues such as facilitating transhipment of critical stores (though selectively as for example with respect to the Palaitana gas-based power project of Tripura), enabling the setting up of a number of border haats (markets) for the benefit of people inhabiting border areas, allowing the swapping of enclaves to go through and, above all, controlling the activities of anti-Indian north eastern militants and even nabbing and handing over some of them to the Indian authorities. It will be the endeavour of the Indian authorities to gauge the likely posture of Begum Khaleda Zia, in the event of the BNP’s return to power after January 2013, on continuation of cooperation in the areas where a large degree of mutual understanding has already been achieved.

    It is interesting that Begum Zia`s visit is taking place just after she, as the head of a BNP delegation, has returned from China. As per official declarations from the BNP`s end as well as from Chinese Government sources, the visit seems to have been another occasion for reiteration of China`s goodwill and commitment towards Bangladesh. China has assured Bangladesh of financial and technical support for the second Padma river bridge, development of the deep-sea port at Sonadia in the Bay of Bengal, operationalising the Chittagong-Kunming rail link (through Myanmar, which will boost China`s trade to and through Bangladesh) and also modernising the Bangladesh Armed Forces. Earlier, China-Bangladesh relations, particularly during the previous Begum Zia regime, were primarily politico-military in nature and derived significance when appraised in the context of China-India competition in South Asia. Nevertheless, Beijing maintained a thrust towards assisting Bangladesh in building up its infrastructure as noticeable from the its earlier aid pattern including the funding of six "friendship bridges" in Bangladesh. Indian leaders will have to contend with the Chinese presence and influence while assessing Begum Zia`s intentions vis-a-vis India. At the same time, they also have to induce her to adopt a positive view on the overall benefits of all-round cooperation with India and overcome the mental block which the opposition political parties in Bangladesh have traditionally had with respect to comprehensive engagement with India.

    A peaceful national election with results accepted by all the political parties of Bangladesh may augur well for India. As per past trends, polls have led to governments alternating between the Awami League and BNP. Therefore, a change of government in Bangladesh may not be unexpected if the next polls there are held properly with the confidence of that country`s stakeholders. If the BNP wins by a good majority, then the prospects of India working out a modus vivendi or a broad range of understanding over core issues of India`s concern viz. control of anti-India militants in Bangladesh, trade and transit of select items from India through Bangladesh between eastern and north eastern parts of India and water sharing would be better though not necessarily assured. India will have to use all its tact to achieve this. However, an acrimonious, violent and less-than-transparent election process, even if resulting in a shaky BNP victory, will imply that the extremist and fundamentalist political elements will act as pressure groups and prevent the next BNP government from moving away from its traditional ambiguous and unfriendly posture towards India. Indian leaders may have to convincingly convey to Begum Zia and her BNP party delegation their commitment towards the economic development of Bangladesh, continuation of Indian aid in different sectors of that country`s economy and also on their positive intent to address the balance of trade issue, irrespective of the party in power there. In essence, India`s Prime Minister will have to indicate that his government has strong political will to work with a government led by Begun Zia.

    A second channel of dialogue at the political party level between the major parties of India and those of Bangladesh including the BNP would have been a reinforcing factor for improving relations between the two countries in the event adequate headway cannot be made at the governmental level. The problem however is that given the situation currently prevailing, the prospects of a peaceful poll with confidence of all concerned in Bangladesh is not too bright. Doing away with the institution of a caretaker government during the polls, which was earlier provided for under the Constitution of Bangladesh, has made the political situation quite volatile in that country. Nonetheless, the present dialogue between the Government of India and the BNP is welcome in the interest of both countries.

    Gautam Sen is ex-Additional CGDA and presently serving as Adviser (Finance) of the Govenment of Nagaland.