EVENTS

You are here

Events

Title Date Author Time Event Body Research Area Topics File attachments Image
Interaction with Ambassador of India to the People’s Republic of China, Shri Pradeep Rawat September 20, 2022 1600 hrs Other

MP-IDSA is organising an interaction with Ambassador of India to the People’s Republic of China, Shri Pradeep Rawat today at 1600 hours in the Boardroom.

Director General, Manohar Parrikar IDSA, Amb Sujan R. Chinoy will chair the interaction.

Talk by Ambassador Naor Gilon, Ambassador of Israel to India September 21, 2022 Talk

Executive Summary

The interactive discussion primarily centred around the following issues: India-Israel bilateral relations, critical areas of cooperation between the two countries, regional geopolitics in West Asia, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), Abraham Accords and the IU2U (India-Israel-UAE-USA). Furthermore, Iran’s role in West Asia, differences in how India and Israel perceive it, the Make in India initiative, and the relationship that Israel shares with Turkey, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, China, the USA and Africa were also discussed. 

Detailed Report

A delegation led by Mr. Naor Gilon, Ambassador of Israel to India, visited the Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (MP-IDSA) on September 21, 2022, for an interaction with the scholars. Ambassador Gilon was accompanied by Mr. Ohad Nakash Kaynar, Deputy Chief of Mission of the Israeli Embassy, Ms. Hagar Spiro-Tal, Political Advisor, and Ms. Sameeksha Chouhan, Assistant, Political Affairs, Embassy of Israel, New Delhi.

The interaction started with the Director General’s introductory remarks where he recalled his visit to Israel in 2019. He highlighted the significance of the India-Israel bilateral relationship and how it has gathered strength in recent years. He underlined how the key elements of the multifaceted relationship between India and Israel, have moved from cooperation in agricultural to high-tech and defence sectors. Finally, he called for the bilateral ties to be further enhanced before inviting Amb. Gilon to deliver his remarks.

Amb. Gilon thanked Amb. Chinoy for hosting him and his colleagues. He began his remarks by reflecting on the unique and special sentiments each Indian has expressed towards Israel. He further emphasised that ties between the two countries reached new heights after Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Israel in 2017, which saw India de-hyphenating the Israel-Palestine issue.

He stated that Iran is the biggest destabiliser in the region. Iran has links with several non-state organisations in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen. He also accused Iran of supporting terrorism in the region and made a mention of Iran’s support for ISIS in the Sinai Peninsula in Egypt. Israel perceives Iran’s destabilising role in the region through its alliance with Shia and Sunni proxy groups like Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, and Houthis. He expressed Israeli reservations about the revival of the JCPOA agreement as it would give financial advantages to Iran as the sanctions would be lifted after the agreement is reached.   

He further stated that Israel’s normalisation of relationship with the Arab countries, known as the “Abraham Accords”, is a game changer in the region’s politics and security. He stated that although the Gulf countries have maintained secret relations with Israel for many years, they have now come out in the open to normalise their relationship. He mentioned that Israel has helped the Gulf countries over many issues in the past, the most prominent being Israeli technology used in desalination projects in the Gulf. Underscoring the gradual normalisation of the relationship between Israel and the Gulf countries, Amb. Gilon stated that Iran has acted as an adhesive in bringing them together as the Gulf countries realise that Israel is the biggest fighter against Iran.

On the other hand, he explained that India and Israel’s differing perceptions of Iran have not impacted their strategic bilateral ties. He stated that India-Israel bilateral relations are growing stronger and stronger. The I2U2 summit is an example of a broader and progressive state of mind visible among participating countries. He argued that the I2U2 has the potential to change the situation in West Asia as the UAE is close to both India and Israel.

The following key points emerged from the floor during the discussion:

  • There is a correlation between the enhancement of Israel’s credibility and Iran’s reduced ability to overtly act against it in forums like the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. Today, according to Israeli authorities, Iran considers both high and low-profile Israeli citizens as legitimate targets.
  • There is no scope for improvement in Israel-Pakistan ties in the foreseeable future. There is potential for India and Israel to collectively take the question of the role played by the deep state in Pakistan and its support for Islamist groups. Israel has deep-seated concerns about Iran following in Pakistan’s footsteps and adopting nuclear proliferation.
  • In 1984, India's elite commando counter-terrorism unit, the National Security Guard, was initially raised and was provided military training by Israeli forces. It has evolved with the establishment of the Joint Steering Committee, whose first meeting was held in 2014.
  • Iran’s destabilising role and fear regarding the ascendency of Shia extremism and radicalisation have spurred Gulf countries and Israel to normalise diplomatic ties. Normalisation of relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel will be a long and gradual process, despite the transformative change the Kingdom is undergoing due to the change in leadership. This is because of the royal family’s symbolic role in the Islamic world.
  • Israel faces security threats due to the Palestinian Authority’s inability to maintain absolute control over cities under its jurisdiction and rising tensions among the people. On the other hand, the threats posed by Hezbollah have been contained for the moment. Nevertheless, Israel has made it clear that any provocation on its part would mean a war against Lebanon and not merely against the organisation since it is, de facto, part of the Lebanese government. Incidentally, Hezbollah is trying to create an alternative front against Israel in Syria.
  • There is significant support within Israel to cooperate with India in its Make in India initiative. Any prospects for cooperation between India and Israel in the field of innovation will depend on the scope of government involvement on both ends and requisite financial investments in appropriate projects. Israel can provide India advisory and technological integration-based support to advance its quest for innovation in water irrigation systems.
  • Despite the ebbs and flows in Turkey’s approach, it has never disrupted the oil flows into Israel via the pipelines that are laid across the country.
  • Israel does not supply any military equipment to China. However, the export of semiconductors cannot be included in this explanation since they also have civilian use.
  • Africa has played a critically important role for Israel, mainly during the 1950s and due to widespread African immigration in the past. There is huge economic potential for Israel in Africa. There are excellent prospects for Israel and India to cooperate across Africa and Sri Lanka.

The session concluded with the Director General’s concluding remarks and exchanging mementoes and books with the Israeli delegation.

This report was prepared by Ms. Saman Ayesha Kidwai, Research Analyst, Counter-Terrorism Centre.

Monday Morning Meeting on "India and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation: Taking Stock of the Summit in Samarkand” September 15, 2022 1000 hrs Monday Morning Meeting

Mr. Jason Wahlang, Research Analyst, Manohar Parrikar IDSA, will speak on "India and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation: Taking Stock of the Summit in Samarkand” at the Monday Morning Meeting which will be held on 19 September 2022 at 10 AM. The venue is Auditorium, Second Floor.

Dr. Rajorshi Roy, Associate Fellow, Manohar Parrikar IDSA, will be the moderator.

Ms. Anandita Bhada, Research Analyst, will be the rapporteur.

MP-IDSA and COMEXI organised a virtual Bilateral Dialogue on India-Mexico Relations in the Contemporary Era August 22, 2022 Bilateral

The Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (MP-IDSA), India and Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales (COMEXI), Mexico held their first Virtual Bilateral Dialogue on 22 August 2022, on the theme “India-Mexico Relations in the Contemporary Era”. In the inaugural session, Ambassador Sujan R. Chinoy, Director General, MP-IDSA, and Dr. Sergio Alcocer, President, COMEXI, delivered the opening remarks, while the special remarks for the dialogue were delivered by Ambassador Pankaj Sharma, Ambassador of India to Mexico, and Ambassador Federico Salas Lotfe, Ambassador of Mexico to India. Session I titled “Regional Developments and Bilateral Relations” was chaired by Ambassador Rajiv Bhatia, Distinguished Fellow, Gateway House and Former Ambassador to Mexico. Dr. Ashok Behuria and Prof. Guadalupe González Chávez shared their thoughts on the regional developments in South Asia and Latin America respectively while Ms. Ruchita Beri and Ambassador Nathan Wolf spoke on India-Mexico Bilateral Relations.  Mr. Vladimir Vázquez Hernández, Deputy Chief of Mission, Embassy of Mexico in Honduras, chaired Session II on “Emerging Areas of Cooperation”. While Col. Vivek Chadha (Retd.) and Mr. Fausto Carbajal Glass spoke on India-Mexico security cooperation, Dr. Rajeesh Kumar and Ms. Irma Gómez Cavazos spoke on India-Mexico multilateral cooperation. In the closing session, concluding remarks were given by Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi (Retd.), Deputy Director General, MP-IDSA on behalf of MP-IDSA and Mr. Vladimir Vázquez Hernández, Deputy Chief of Mission, Embassy of Mexico in Honduras on behalf of COMEXI. The event was livestreamed on You Tube and was attended on the virtual platform by all scholars and interns of MP-IDSA, members of COMEXI, invitees from the Embassy of India in Mexico and Embassy of Mexico in India.

Executive Summary

The dialogue underscored the importance of India-Mexico bilateral relationships and proposed new areas of cooperation that can be further explored to strengthen their ties. Session I discussed India-Mexico bilateral relations and regional developments. It shed light on regional developments in South Asia like India’s efforts to help integrate and promote prosperity in its neighbourhood, the new regime in Kabul and its ripple effects on the region, especially Pakistan; and the evolving situation in Latin American and Caribbean nations, a historical analysis of the developments and challenges of the region juxtaposed with the current changes in the region. The session also drew attention to India-Mexico bilateral relations and the shared Indo-Mexican interest in the African continent, underlined new areas of cooperation in sectors like energy, agriculture and food processing, looking at Mexico as a gateway to Latin America and, highlighted the need for Mexico and India to unite in dealing with the challenges facing the world.  It was assessed that the climate crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine crisis and the resultant supply chain crisis and their consequences have permanently altered the socio-economic structures within South Asia and Latin America.

The prospects for defence and security cooperation between India and Mexico, as well as multilateral cooperation, were both discussed during the second session of the meeting. The discussion on defence and security cooperation centered on the possibilities for India-Mexico security partnership in space, defence manufacturing, terrorism, among others. In light of the fact that both nations are non-permanent members of the UN Security Council (UNSC), the discussion also centered on expanding multilateral cooperation between the two.

Detailed Report

Inaugural Session

Ambassador Sujan R. Chinoy, Director General, MP-IDSA and former Indian Ambassador to Mexico launched the first MP-IDSA – COMEXI Virtual Bilateral Dialogue, extending his warm welcome to the panellists for the inaugural session, other attendees, and participants for the evening. Furthermore, he expressed his hope to have a physical meeting in the foreseeable future while expressing his gratitude to Ambassador Federico Salas Lotfe and Ambassador Pankaj Sharma for agreeing to deliver the special remarks. Ambassador Chinoy as part of his opening remarks noted the centuries-old ties between India and Mexico, including the links between Mayans and South India and the flouring trade Mexico has shared with countries in the Indo-Pacific region. He underlined how India-Mexico ties are representative of mutual understanding, all-around cooperation, high-level meetings, and privileged partnerships that have provided an impetus to bilateral cooperation in the contemporary era. Moreover, the recent exchange of visits by the foreign ministers and sixth round of Foreign Office Consultations have further consolidated bilateral ties. Over the years, new avenues of cooperation between Mexico and India have emerged in crop monitoring, drought assessments, and capacity building between the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) and Agencia Espacial Mexicana (Mexican Space Agency).He further touched on emerging geopolitical developments and conflicts and, India and Mexico’s role as emerging or middle-powers in the rapidly-evolving world order. He also underscored how the geographical distance between the two countries does not act as an impediment, as this virtual dialogue demonstrates. On the other hand, the Ambassador, highlighting India and Mexico’s role as non-permanent members of the UNSC and in the G20, asserted how there is scope for new convergences in areas such as climate change, renewable energy, and terrorism. In the foreseeable future, India must deepen trade ties with Mexico, including in the Pacific alliance. Furthermore, he shed light on their mutual interests in Africa and how possibilities of joint projects in selective countries should be explored while establishing frequent dialogues on issues such as border management, particularly drugs and illegal arms crossing. The speaker also flagged how another area of cooperation is India’s defence sector, open to foreign investment, and Mexico’s strengths in areas such as Aerospace are of particular interest. Additionally, he mentioned how defence and naval cooperation are other areas to be explored and bolstered. Afterwards, he gave the floor to Dr. Alcocer. Dr. Sergio Alcocer, President, COMEXI, expressed his gratitude to his fellow panellists and spoke about the fruitful relationship between Mexico and India, various similarities, and room for opportunity between the two countries. He also referred to these evolving ties amid great power competition and the Ukraine conflict. He further highlighted think tanks’ role in building peace and prosperity between nations and how science, education, and technology are avenues for increased cooperation between India and Mexico. On the other hand, the speaker spoke about how regular contact should be maintained between the two countries and appreciated the quality of engineers and scientists based in India and the technological advances it has made in areas such as biotechnology and cognitive science. He also mentioned that water management is another area of cooperation, mainly because Mexico has been experiencing one of the worst droughts in the past years. His country also has a substantive interest in engaging in defence exchanges and cooperation. After thanking him for his thoughtful remarks, Ambassador Chinoy welcomed Ambassadors Sharma and Ambassador Lotfe to deliver their special remarks for the evening and expressed his gratitude for their support in conducting this bilateral dialogue.

Ambassador Pankaj Sharma, Ambassador of India to Mexico, expressed his gratitude to those present and MP-IDSA and COMEXI for conducting this webinar. He remarked how such events help bridge the gap in understanding, analysing, reviewing the bilateral relationship, and charting the path forward. He underlined how both countries are on a similar development path and share a unified vision based on common principles. Additionally, there is a mutual resolve to elevate the privileged partnership to a strategic partnership, and its roadmap was laid during Prime Minister Modi’s visit to Mexico in 2016. The speaker pointed out how India and Mexico have robust economies and are positioned to play important roles in their respective neighbourhoods. On the other hand, business and investments are critical aspects of this bilateral relationship, and in 2021, India emerged as one of Mexico’s top 10 trading partners, with bilateral trade reaching $10.1 billion.

Moreover, he spoke about how the pharmaceutical and automobile industries are key growth areas and investments for these two countries. There is an increasing presence of Indian companies in Mexico and vice-versa, and the signing of MoUs between reputed universities, signalling growing academic exchanges, mainly regarding Ayurveda, have taken place. In 2022, eight Mexican cities celebrated International Yoga Day. Efforts are also underway to sign a bilateral investment treaty to strengthen the bilateral institutional framework. He emphasised the need for regular political dialogues between India and Mexico to help them work better within international organisations like the United Nations. Finally, the growing convergence of interests allows the two countries to strengthen international regimes collectively.Ambassador Chinoy thanked Ambassador Sharma for his remarks and expressed his hope to see India and Mexico establish enduring ties, following which he invited Ambassador Lotfe to deliver his remarks.Ambassador Federico Salas Lotfe, Ambassador of Mexico to India, expressed his appreciation to be invited to be a part of the webinar and remarked on the able leadership of Ambassador Chinoy and Dr. Alcocer, which helped bring this event to fruition. He also fondly recalled meeting with Ambassador Chinoy a few months ago regarding this event’s conduct. Moreover, he spoke about the growing relationship between Mexico and India, signs visible across all spectrums, including trade. Information and space technology, agriculture, and artificial intelligence are critical areas of cooperation between the two countries. There is also visible cooperation across multilateral and international formats to better serve both countries' interests. Therefore, in this context, more communication channels between them must open as they move forward with their ties, this webinar being an essential example and an important first step in that direction. He also reiterated Ambassador Chinoy’s call to conduct an in-person meeting soon. Ambassador Chinoy thanked Ambassador Lotfe for his kind remarks and emphasised how India-Mexico strategic partnership should be multifaceted, mainly focused on trade and economic linkages. Finally, he extended an offer to conduct an annual bilateral dialogue between MP-IDSA and COMEXI, gradually introducing other stakeholders as a part of this initiative. With these remarks, he concluded the inaugural session and gave the floor to Ambassador Bhatia, who chaired the first session.

Session I

The first session on “Regional Developments and Bilateral Relations” was chaired by Ambassador Rajiv Bhatia, Distinguished Fellow, Gateway House and Former Ambassador of India to Mexico. He mentioned that relations with Mexico have been developing over the past decades but are seen to be picking up pace lately. Within India, there isn’t a lot of widespread awareness about Mexico’s foreign policy and the role it plays in matters of international importance. He praised Mexico for making good strides in its foreign policy, even though critics say otherwise, owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, domestic policies and the impact of the Russia-Ukraine crisis. Indo Pacific is another shared concern for the two countries. This region holds Mexico’s interest for economic reasons and India’s for geopolitical ones.

The chair requested the speakers to shed light on how Mexico will deal with the geopolitical dynamics unravelling in the Indo Pacific and Asian continent. How will it merge with India’s recent foreign policy? Ambassador Bhatia mentioned that for the last fifteen years, focus has been on elevating the India-Mexico privileged relationship to the level of strategic partnership. For this to take shape without any delays, the involvement of the highest political echelons is a must. The Parliament Speaker, Om Birla’s upcoming visit to Mexico reflects well of the Indian intentions. The chair highlighted the bilateral cooperation between India and Mexico, in the economic sphere and in science and technology and space. In taking relations forward, now defence and security cooperation are becoming important facets of this bilateral relationship. Concluding his initial remarks, the chair stated that cooperation between academic institutes and think tanks of the two countries should be sped up to give way for deep discussions on matters of importance and exchange of thought.

Dr. Ashok Behuria (Senior Fellow and Coordinator, South Asia Centre, MP-IDSA) spoke on the “Recent Developments in South Asia”. He commenced by highlighting the significant role of India in the Asian sub-continent. The sheer size of its landmass, geographic location, its huge defence expenditure and the GDP reflect the importance that India holds amongst its neighbours. It’s policy of look east and act east have been ways of furthering integration in the south and south east Asian regions. These efforts could have yielded better results with cooperation from the western neighbours, which was found wanting. The pandemic has worsened economic and political conditions in many of the neighbouring countries like Sri Lanka and Myanmar. India however, has stood like a pillar of stability in the region and provided all possible non reciprocal help to its neighbours in the form of aid, assistance and vaccines. It also has a huge line of credit for Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal and Maldives amongst others. India also undertook US $2 billion investment in Afghanistan from 2001-2021, reflecting its efforts to work tirelessly for regional integration, growth and prosperity.

Dr. Behuria mentioned the hindrance of Pakistan in providing India with territorial access to its north-western and central Asian neighbourhoods. During the pandemic, Afghanistan also witnessed a regime change, which has redefined the security dynamics of the Asian continent. Taliban is averse to upholding the rights of women and minorities, slipping into regressive radicalism.  This is resulting in the promotion of reactive radicalism outside of Afghanistan, amongst like-minded organisations and groups. The fashion in which the US withdrawal took place in Afghanistan has encouraged Taliban and like-minded groups to pursue their agendas with full vigor. Its ripple effects are gradually percolating outside Afghanistan and are being felt by Pakistan in their dealings with the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan.

Dr. Behuria mentioned the global rise in terrorism and radicalism, with special emphasis on the Af-Pak region. There have been small scale attacks in other Asian states like Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Maldives but nothing of the scale witnessed in Afghanistan. However, this opens a window of opportunity for India-Mexico cooperation over counter terrorism efforts. The speaker also mentioned the economic meltdown, triggering regime changes in Sri Lanka and Nepal and the Galwan Valley incident, where China single-handedly tried to alter the status quo at LAC. Such incidents should prompt democratic countries to join hands in discovering and innovating ways to make democratic systems less debt-ridden and cumbersome. Dr. Behuria concluded with the thought that South Asian nations need to first settle their conflicts and then work towards a larger economic integration. This will encourage mutual growth and prosperity but can only successfully materialise with full efforts from all partner countries.

Prof. Guadalupe González Chávez, (Consultant, Columnist, El Heraldo de México, Professor, and Associate, COMEXI) spoke on the “Recent Developments in Latin America”. She elaborated analytically on the key developments unfolding in the region. Being a region full of diversity, fighting with hunger, economic de-escalation, violence and the after effects of the pandemic, its governance assumes paramount importance for Latin America. Prof. Chávez recognizes that owing to instability and low living standards in certain parts of this region, it is receptive to intra as well as inter-continental migration. Intra-regional communications and inter-state relations were in place from before the advent of Europeans.

The speaker observed that Latin American and Caribbean nations work together as a region in UN bodies and other organisations. For them it is important to address the development of the region and stand united in their demands. There are political differences and disagreements between the countries but the ultimate goal is of global peace and development. She pointed out that public administration alone cannot promise development. There is a need for the involvement of various social, political and economic institutions and organisations within the country to bring about real development. This is what is the region is struggling with in current times.

Prof. Chávez observed that the Latin American and Caribbean region has been subject to constant crisis and change for the past few decades, from the 1960s revolutions in Cuba and Nicaragua, which brought about social change, to the current trend of “new constitutionalism” that has rigged the region. In last three years, a lot of traditional legal constitutions have been changed, to varying degrees. The most recent example being Chile, where plebiscite is due over constitutional changes. The speaker observed that the need for large scale social change and an open digital society have been evident post pandemic in many Latin American countries. Justice and Rule of law have been discussed for the past two decades in Latin America and play a significant role in achieving regional peace and stability. However, the region is gripped with challenges in achieving political openness and organised governance. There is also absence of social justice and prevalence of human rights abuses in El Salvador, Nicaragua and Guatemala.

Prof. Chávez pointed out the new tendency in the region to recognise social diversity, pluralism, multiculturalism and the need for social integration in the region. Non-proliferation and non-possession of nuclear weapons is a key factor which integrates and promotes cooperation amongst regional members. Peace and stability should continue to be a part of the integration process following any political or military crisis. In conclusion, the speaker mentioned Pacific alliance as yet another key platform where Chile, Colombia, Peru and Mexico can come together to develop significant outcomes over political, economic, academic and other arenas of cooperation. For Latin America the goal right now is to solve the integration issues and disparities, to solve the intra and inter regional problems pertaining to climate change, integration and institutionalisation of norms.

Ms. Ruchita Beri (Senior Research Associate and Coordinator, Africa, LAC & UN Centre, MP-IDSA) spoke on “India-Mexico Bilateral Relations, Perspective from India”. She referred to the India and Mexico roadmap to upgrade their relationship to strategic partnership. To attain that, she focused on four pillars of cooperation between the two countries. First being energy cooperation, where crude oil forms a major component. India is the third largest global importer of crude, whereas Mexico is the fourth largest producer. However, Indian crude imports from Mexico are bound to decrease next year, owing to the Mexican President’s policy of energy independence which focuses inwards for reducing costly refined imports. This move may shift the focus to climate friendly renewable sources of energy. A report from Mckenzie suggests that being rich in solar, geothermal and wind energy, Mexico has the potential to assume the leadership in clean energy, hence, increasing avenues of cooperation with India. The recent statement of the Mexican President in support of transition to clean energy reinforces the hope of increased India-Mexico cooperation in alternate sources of energy.

The second pillar is agriculture and food security. Cooperation in this sector isn’t new for the two countries. Mexican wheat variety formed the backbone of Indo-Mexican wheat during the green revolution in India in the 1960s. Both the countries share similar topography and climate conditions, making cooperation in the agro-sector more fruitful. The two countries have a wide array of cooperation possibilities in fisheries, food processing equipment, agro products, improved seed and farm equipment. The new pact inked between India and Mexico over space technology will help to get space inputs for crop monitoring, drought assessment and capacity building in agricultural sector. This gives hope to further cooperation between Indian and Mexican chambers of trade and commerce.

The third pillar is considering Mexico as the gateway to Latin America. India’s diplomatic and trade relations with this region have been neglected in the past due to issues of political diversity, lack of adequate human resources, language barrier and poor connectivity. But now Mexico is seen as the key to connect to Latin America and Carribean states. It is a part of the Pacific alliance and Latin America is also a top destination for investments abroad. All of this makes Mexico the key to access Latin American trade routes and markets. The fourth pillar is the shared interest in the African continent. India has a historical relation with Africa but Mexico’s contact with the region is comparatively less, particularly with Sub-Saharan Africa. The economic potential of Africa is attracting more diplomatic presence from Mexico and other external powers. India has initiated triangular cooperation models in Africa with like-minded countries (Japan, US, UAE). Certain East African countries are also a part of the Indo Pacific region, increasing their significance for India. The latter may consider collaborating with Mexico in future over these geographically distant but strategically important waters, owing to their interest in the Indo Pacific.

The speaker concluded that growing convergence at the government-to-government level between India and Mexico should give impetus to increased dialogue at the industry, think tanks, civil society and academic levels.

Ambassador Nathan Wolf (Former Ambassador of Mexico to Singapore and Member, COMEXI) shared his thoughts on “India-Mexico Bilateral Relations, Perspective from Mexico”. He mentioned the warm and cordial relations shared between India and Mexico. He stated the transition of India-Mexico ties from a privileged partnership to a strategic partnership happened in 2016. In order to follow the roadmap as laid out by the two governments, there is a need to deepen cooperation in science and technology, space cooperation, IT, medicine, education and facilitation of trade and investments by both the countries. Ambassador Wolf highlighted the similarities of cultural relations and people to people contacts which are important for pushing ahead the strategic partnership. He also spoke of Latin America and South Asia facing similar challenges like COVID-19 pandemic, recession and economic crisis, which has permanently altered the socio, economic and political course of these regions.

The speaker mentioned certain factors which should be taken into account to assess the well-being of citizens. A few of those are, increasing poverty and transition to a green economy. The latter is also a major component of the sustainable development goals laid out by the UN. Transition of geopolitical interests due to COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, technological advancements, environmental and climate changes, have brought about certain socio-political changes that have led to emergence of new assets for nations like Mexico and India. This is proving to be a critical factor in modifying the system of alliances. Changing investment environment and the borderless digital world is making companies adopt business models different from their traditional ones.

In conclusion, Ambassador Wolf highlighted factors like climate change, cyberattacks and social inequality, which make it imperative for countries like India and Mexico to join hands in dealing with them collectively. The asymmetric global recovery from the pandemic and the resultant disruption in the critical supply chains is further delaying the economic recovery of many nations and industries. The Russia- Ukraine crisis has taken poverty, malnutrition and economic problems to another level. The international measures taken to mitigate this crisis have further dented the financial situation, increased the risk of inflation and triggered global economic slowdown. Increased migratory flows have been a classic characteristic of our crisis ridden world lately and to deal with all this successfully, India and Mexico should deepen their collaboration and cooperation.

Q/A session: There were two questions put up from the audience regarding the Mexican President’s visit to India for the G20 summit and the absence of India being mentioned in the Mexican Government’s National Development Plan (PND), which laid down plans and objectives of interaction with Asia. Ambassador Wolf answered the questions suggesting that the Mexican President has very restricted travel plans and has undertaken only a few trips within the region, at short distances. He did not express hope over a possible change in this pattern, leading to his physical presence at India’s chairmanship of the G20 this year. For the second question, he recognised that while referring to Asia, the bias is evident in over-emphasis on China as compared to the other Asian countries. He highlighted that dialogues such as this will prove helpful in overcoming similar hurdles and expanding the horizon of relations with the Asian continent. He stated that Mexico and India should work alongside each other.

Session II

The second session on “Emerging Areas of Cooperation” was chaired by Mr. Vladimir Vázquez Hernández, the Deputy Chief of Mission at the Embassy of Mexico in Honduras. He underscored that Mexico was the first Latin American country to recognise India upon its independence and to establish diplomatic ties with it in 1950. He delineated how India has made tremendous advancements in the fields of trade and development, and how it is presently combating the pandemic with its pharmaceutical capabilities. The pandemic has also demonstrated the need of having a decentralised ecosystem for vaccine production. He invited the panelists to discuss this further and to expand on the two countries' multilateral cooperation.

Col. Vivek Chadha (Retd.) (Research Fellow, Military Affairs Centre, MP-IDSA) discussed the possibilities of the India-Mexico security partnership, stating that there has not been enough cooperation on security related matters.  He highlighted specific areas where the two nations' security partnership had the potential to progress. The first is concerned with terrorism and radicalisation. The speaker continues by asserting that it is important to participate in a worldwide struggle against the spread of terrorism. Regulation and agreement on certain basic and broad principles can assist with it as well. In the area of the relationship between crime, money laundering, and terrorist funding, the speaker added that there is a need to go beyond traditional areas of security while planning security cooperation between governments, to include sectors engaged in the management of the financial and the private sector. 

Defence manufacturing is another area where India and Mexico can further cooperate. One of the success stories of the 'Aatma Nirbhar' project involves the indigenous design and construction of warships for the Indian Navy and Coast Guard. Aside from naval vessels, there are other programmes underway to build drones and surveillance technology, which may be of interest to Mexico as well.

Border management is a major challenge for both India and Mexico. Both India and Mexico encounter several obstacles along their huge coastlines. The Coast Guard's capability has grown significantly throughout the years. This features an upgraded monitoring grid that aids in greater transparency of responsibility regions.

Col. Chadha also emphasised the need of working together to support projects for disaster relief and humanitarian aid. On a number of occasions, India has been among the first responders to aid and evacuate individuals afflicted by natural disasters and conflict zones. The security forces of both countries have extensive experience that may be provided on a reciprocal basis, to presence in courses of instruction and training academies.  The speaker's final point on the possibilities for defence and security collaboration is space cooperation, which may include security-related areas such as communications, for which India has deployed a number of satellites for its own security agencies. The chair contributed to the conversation by stating that water management will be critical in the next decades. In addition, both nations are dealing with the impacts of climate change. As a result, this issue will become even more critical, and both the Coast Guard and defence manufacturers must work together to achieve a clear understanding in the coming years.

Mr. Fausto Carbajal Glass (Lecturer, Universidad Anáhuac Mexico and Member, COMEXI) initiated the discussion by congratulating India on the celebration of its 75th year of independence. Mr. Glass discussed potential areas of security cooperation between India and Mexico, as well as the concept of universal access to vaccines. India has come to assist Mexico in supplying vaccines during the latter's crisis. He went on to say that one of the lessons learned during the pandemic was that Mexico should strengthen its bilateral relationship with India, particularly in the field of pharmaceuticals, as well as bilateral cooperation on scientific matters and scientific research, in order to be better prepared to face similar security challenges in the future.  

The space sector, particularly in the fields of remote sensing, satellite communications, and peaceful use of outer space, should be an expanding area of security cooperation. It is worth noting that India is a country that has developed satellites and low-cost spacecraft, and is therefore indeed a noteworthy and exceptional achievement. Cooperation between the two space agencies, in particular, would boost Mexico's satellite ability to deal with natural disasters such as hurricanes or earthquakes, massive fires, and so on. It is critical to strengthen bilateral collaboration and involve joint research and innovation in the field. The speaker also discussed the future prospects of security cooperation between the two nations.

Dr. Rajeesh Kumar (Associate Fellow, MP-IDSA) addressed India's priorities and interests in various global multilateral fora, and listed out the possible areas of multilateral cooperation between India and Mexico. Dr. Kumar noted that India's multilateral approach has evolved considerably between 1947 and 2022. In an era when rivalries dominate global politics and the relevance of multilateralism is questioned, one may consider whether India and Mexico should encourage multilateral cooperation by investigating possible areas where India and Mexico can cooperate, as well as, areas where cooperation is limited. Both nations, who are UNSC non-permanent members, seek UNSC reforms demonstrating the potential for collaboration in this area. Within the United Nations, there are issues where India and Mexico may cooperate and work together, such as global terrorism, which is a priority for both India and Mexico.

Similarly, there are possibilities to boost multilateral cooperation between the two on peacekeeping issues.  Mexico opened a joint training center for peacekeeping operations in 2020. India has extensive expertise in this area, and the two countries might work together to exchange knowledge and resources in this field. Another multilateral platform for issues related to trade will be the World Trade Organization (WTO). The agricultural sector is the cornerstone of the present WTO discussions, and both countries are attempting to correct the anomalies in agriculture and food subsidies. Cooperation in the G-20 will be another test for both Mexico and India to see how the idea for reforms in multilateral organisations can be implemented. Dr. Kumar concluded by saying that India and Mexico need to better understand each other's political realities, capabilities, and goals. Both sides must define their priorities after realistically assessing their skills and prospects for participation in multilateral platforms.

Ms. Irma Gómez Cavazos (Advisor, Secretaries of Equality and Inclusion, and Education of Nuevo Leon & former Undersecretary for International Cooperation and Economic) centered her thoughts on the importance of education in the future of multilateral cooperation. Technology is driving the educational system and process. There is a need to concentrate on the curriculum development process and to incorporate coding and data sciences into school curricula. India has extensive experience in these areas of technology. The MP-IDSA and COMEXI may collaborate with the embassies in both countries to increase university collaboration between the countries. She also reiterated how Mexico can act as the door to Latin America and added that education, health, and the water management system, are three main areas of cooperation between India and Mexico that need immediate attention.

Ms. Cavazos noted that it was essential to discuss how each country's skills might be brought together on the table and find ways to have a shared agenda at multilateral cooperation organisations such as the United Nations. There is a need to begin the process of identifying themes and working on the many areas of expertise that both institutions have in order to discover methods to undertake triangular cooperation with Latin America and Africa, as well as multilateral cooperation in the international arena. In his concluding remarks, the chair mentioned solar energy technology for tackling climate change as part of the triangular cooperation.

Closing Session

In his closing statement, Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi (Retd.), Deputy Director General, MP-IDSA, spoke on the immense potential for India and Mexico to strengthen defence cooperation and engage in areas such as countering transnational terrorism. He went on to say that activities like this bilateral dialogue would help propel the strategic partnership announced in 2016. He further stated that MP-IDSA anticipates more similar exchanges in the future.

In his concluding remarks on behalf of COMEXI, Mr. Vladimir Vázquez Hernández said that new global actors are emerging and that Mexico and India shall be well suited to confronting those challenges jointly in the reconfiguration of the international order.

This report was prepared by Ms. Saman Ayesha Kidwai, Research Analyst, Counter-Terrorism Centre, MP-IDSA, Ms. Anandita Bhada, Research Analyst, Europe and Eurasia Centre, MP-IDSA and Ms. Bulbul Prakash, Intern, ALACUN Centre, MP-IDSA.

Monday Morning Meeting on Artificial Intelligence and National Security August 08, 2022 Sanur Sharma 1000 hrs Monday Morning Meeting

Dr. Sanur Sharma, Associate Fellow, Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (MP-IDSA), spoke on “Artificial Intelligence and National Security” at the Monday Morning Meeting held on 8 August 2022. The session was chaired by Dr. Cherian Samuel, Research Fellow. Ambassador Sujan R. Chinoy, Director General, MP-IDSA, Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi (Retd.), Deputy Director General, MP-IDSA, scholars of the Institute, and online participants were in attendance.

Executive Summary

Artificial Intelligence (AI) refers to the ability of machines to perform cognitive tasks like thinking, perceiving, learning, problem solving and decision making. Many AI applications are dual-use, where they have both military and civil applications. In the military sector AI has various applications in Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance; Logistics; Cyberspace Operations; Information Operations (and “Deep Fakes”); Command and Control; Semi-Autonomous and Autonomous Vehicles; and Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS). More than 30 Countries including - US, China, Russia, India UK, France have released their National Plan and Strategy on AI. Further, the threats due to Al’s Penetration into National Security and Global Geopolitics have potential to start a new arms race. There are also policy, regulatory, and ethical issues pertaining to AI. In the context of India, the Defence Minister has stated that lessons drawn from the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict will push the Indian Armed Forces to adopt emerging technologies like AI in various defence systems.

Detailed Report

Dr. Cherian Samuel commenced the session by welcoming the audience to the Monday Morning Meeting. He introduced the topic and stated that everyone experiences Artificial Intelligence (AI) in one form or another, most commonly with speaking assistants, google maps, etc. He mentioned that there are certain swirling controversies surrounding AI, like ethical issues which are magnified when AI is used in defence applications like Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS). He also suggested that the full potential of AI is yet to be discovered and on the flipside potential dangers of using these technologies are a concern. Therefore, when it comes to AI and National Security, the security dilemma is exacerbated since there is a lack of clarity on how AI enabled weapons will operate in the battlefield. There are many complexities with this technology that need to be unpacked.

With these remarks, Dr. Cherian invited Dr. Sanur Sharma to make her presentation. Dr. Sharma started her presentation by listing all the elements of her presentation. She stated that there have been numerous definitions of AI in AI literature. She mentioned that the actual definition of AI is an enabler to technologies because it has applications throughout all sectors. She listed some unique characteristics of AI; they are dual-use, meaning they have both military and civil applications, they are relatively less transparent, which means their  integration into a product may not be immediately recognisable, creating concerns amongst policy makers. However, she suggested that there is now a concept called explainable AI where the decision maker is able to comprehend and trust the results generated by the AI model and interpret how a particular decision has been made through these algorithms and models. She elaborated on the use of AI in predictive analytics, deep learning, language processing models (NLP), expert systems for healthcare, video and text recognition, robotics, planning and optimisation.

She stated that there has been a lot of debate on the use of AI by political and business leaders and its threats. Therefore, AI does require regulation. However, she felt that the concern of AI being an existential threat to humanity was debatable. In the private sector alone, around US$95 billion was spent on AI in 2021. She further mentioned that AI has gained the attention of commercial investors, defence intellectuals, policy makers, and international competitors alike. Recent developments like increased use of Al in cyberattacks and growth of hybrid warfare techniques have showcased how Al can potentially affect national security. Advances in AI will affect national security by driving change in three areas: Military, Information, and Economic Superiority.

She listed and explained in detail various AI defence applications like Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR); Logistics; Cyberspace Operations; Information Operations (and “Deep Fakes”); Command and Control; Semi-Autonomous and Autonomous Vehicles; and LAWS. While explaining the ISR applications of AI, she gave the example of Project Maven where through material shared by Google and the US Department of Defense, the machine learning model behind the software used in Project Maven was trained to identify 38 different kinds of objects and, has already been deployed to locations in the Middle East and Africa, where it is helping military analysts sort through the mountains of data their sensors and drones soak up on a daily basis.

Further, the training and simulation applications of AI for the military were also discussed by Dr. Sharma. She stated that war-gaming is a well-established tradition in the PLA, given China’s relative lack of real-world combat experience. Also, AI-based war-gaming software for use in professional military education programs are on the rise. Dr. Sharma apprised the audience of the AI application for command and control. She emphasised that it is likely that the PLA’s most significant AI-enabled C2 projects are classified. Several Chinese enterprises advertise AI systems capable of automating some elements of command and control—including knowledge mapping, decision support, weapon target assignment, and combat tasking. She asserted that AI was the top military technology in 2022 in terms of impact a technology will have on the military sector. In terms of adoption of AI in the defence sector, almost 49 per cent of defence organisations are in the adoption process of AI.

Drawing attention to AI and a military case study, she spoke on the Russia-Ukraine Conflict and AI role in it. She stated that AI has been used extensively in the conflict. Russian Troll Farms have used AI to generate human faces for fake, propagandist personas, AI audio and video disinformation. Softwares like Clearview AI, SpaceKnow, Snorkel AI are being used to analyse signals and adversary communications, identify high-value information, and use it to guide diplomacy and decision-making. She further talked about the disruptions caused due to AI. The US, Russia, and China are trying to incorporate AI into their military equipment rapidly. Absence of global coalitions to regulate Al based tools can lead to rogue states and non-state actors getting access to these technologies.

Elaborating on Al’s penetration into national security and global geopolitics, she talked in detail about China, Russia and the US. On July 20, 2017, the Chinese Government released a strategy detailing its plan to take the lead in AI by 2030. Less than two months later Vladimir Putin publicly announced Russia’s intent to pursue AI technologies, stating, “Whoever becomes the leader in this field will rule the world” ('Whoever leads in AI will rule the world’: Putin to Russian children on Knowledge Day, Russia Today, 1 September 2017). Similarly, in the US, the National Defense Strategy, released in January 2018, identified artificial intelligence as one of the key technologies that will ensure [the United States] will be able to fight and win the wars of the future. More than 30 Countries including - UK, France, Germany, Finland, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Mexico, Kenya, Tunisia and UAE have all released their National Plan and Strategy on AI. She emphasised that China is leapfrogging into this technology along with Europe which is doing well with a very comprehensive General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). India is now moving ahead in its investments too. She then discussed the AI development timelines of the US, China and India. Proliferation of Al in weapon systems in combination with absence of international regulation on their development could lead to a new arms race. Finally, the dual-use nature of Al based tools creates a scenario where non-state actors hold significant resources and thus have the potential for weaponisation of Al.

Talking about the roadmap of development of AI in India, she stated that India is not a late entrant in this field. India has come up with the AI development policy under the NITI Aayog but it was for the civil and private sector with focus towards healthcare, agriculture, e-commerce, etc. In defence, India got into AI later in 2019 through the Defence AI Council (DAIC) and Defence AI Project Agency (DAIPA). Both of the agencies are funded to the tune of Rs.100 Cr collectively for R&D into AI-enabled products in the defence sector. India’s advancements in AI have been promising. The Indian Navy is currently working on 30 AI projects on autonomous systems, maritime domain awareness, perimeter security, decision making, predictive inventory maintenance and management. The Navy is also establishing an AI Centre of Excellence at INS Valsura in Jamnagar, equipped with a modern lab on AI and Big Data Analytics. The Army has set up an AI Centre at Military College of Telecommunication Engineering in Mhow. The Indian Army is also conducting trials of indigenously AI enabled unmanned all-terrain vehicles in Ladakh in August 2022. She quoted the Indian Defence Minister stating that through lessons drawn from the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, the Indian Armed Forces are pushing for adoption of new technologies.

Discussing the policy, regulatory, and ethical issues of AI, Dr. Sharma explained that in AI Ethics and Transparency, AI systems raise questions concerning the criteria used in automated decision making. Dr. Sharma concluded her presentation by pointing out a few key takeaways. She stated that the entry of Artificial Intelligence in the security domain has shown us glimpses of the complexity and the need for preparedness that is required to assimilate it. With further growth of Al, the threats it presents and opportunities it creates for national security will progressively multiply. Based on the world experience on AI, she suggested a way forward for India, which involves infrastructure development, policy & regulations, research & development, and human resource development. Along with a clear policy, there is a dire need to invest in critical infrastructure so that the data servers lie within the territory. Finally she asserted the importance of indigenous development, civil-military fusion, tapping the civilian innovation ecosystem, international cooperation, and balancing adoption and innovation.

Discussion

Ambassador Sujan R. Chinoy congratulated Dr. Sharma for her presentation on a very complex topic. He stated that AI is going to be one of the determining factors in future great power contestations and wars along with future use and misuse of data, and manipulation of politics through social media. Therefore, lack of attention and investments in this area will only be at India’s peril. He stated that since there are no ethical yardsticks currently available which will guide India into investing only in certain areas, India must put in more investments and analyse what the competitors are doing and try to match up. It has been observed how the Chinese ran the initiative on the hardware side first and then caught up on the software side. Therefore, India needs to put in more work. Ambassador Chinoy also emphasised the importance of MP-IDSA working on AI, particularly on its implications for the military. He also highlighted the significance of Unmanned Autonomous Vehicles (UAVs), especially the threat of unmanned underwater vehicles deployed by adversaries that may collect our data.

Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi mentioned that AI related systems need very complex programming and programming AI systems to learn for themselves is even more complicated and unpredictable. Transparency and predictability are not in the control of the designer and that is where the danger lies. He also talked briefly about the applications of AI in the military sector.

Ms. Krutika Patil put forth her views on AI being different from other technologies. Unlike other technologies that can be bought directly and utilised in any environment with few modifications, interoperability is not possible with AI. Building AI systems is pure hard work and India would need unique data for AI to work for its defence requirements. She also mentioned that the US has a more advanced defence AI ecosystem than China due to its access to contextual data.

Dr. Rajiv Nayan too reiterated that the subject of AI is complex. He expressed his concern over the definitions of AI and stated that one must be careful with the meaning of these definitions since when science becomes social science, concepts tend to get more complicated. He emphasised on the need to delve upon the debate of who makes the war, man or machine. Technologies like AI are a higher form of automation that will make the war simpler. He also mentioned that China is not surging as much ahead in AI as it appears.

Dr. Swasti Rao asked about the dangers related to AI capabilities of non-state actors and expressed concern related to open source research on AI and military, and whether the complexity of the issue can be gauged through open source research. Dr. Sanur Sharma answered by asserting that AI researchers working on security issues need to integrate with the defence institutions to gain access to appropriate data to gauge the level of threats and complexities.

Ambassador Saurabh Kumar enquired if India had taken any initiatives in the United Nations on the ethical and legal aspects of AI. He asserted that India should consider taking such steps similar to India’s role in 1982 on the relationship between disarmament and development. Dr. Sharma responded by mentioning that she is not aware of India taking such initiatives but she has come across reports of China insisting on having a dialogue on said topic in the UN.

Mr. Dinesh Pathak emphasised that since security has two components, reading risks and determining response, AI can help in the first one but response needs to be the application of mind and the role of a human is also essential.

Mr. Niranjan Oak posed a question on the role of private sector investment in the innovation of AI. He enquired about possible steps taken by western countries to counter Chinese investments and influence in western AI start-ups. Dr. Sharma answered by mentioning that the US is taking various measures like creating a list of Chinese entities that are infiltrating US-based AI start-ups.

The discussion ended with a vote of thanks by Dr. Cherian Samuel.

The report has been prepared by Ms. Krutika Patil, Research Assistant, Cybersecurity Project, MP-IDSA.

North America & Strategic Technologies
Talk by Ambassador Pankaj Sharma on “India’s Interest in Disarmament and International Security” & “India-Mexico Relations” July 15, 2022 1200 hrs Talk

The Indian Pugwash Society and Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (MP-IDSA) organised a talk on “India’s Interest in Disarmament and International Security” and “India-Mexico Relations” by Ambassador Pankaj Sharma on 15 July 2022, at 1200 hrs in Seminar Hall I. Ambassador Sujan R. Chinoy, Convenor, Indian Pugwash Society & Director General, MP-IDSA chaired the session. The talk was attended by all scholars of MP-IDSA.

Executive Summary

The talk was centred on international disarmament initiatives carried out through several platforms, including the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), and the Conference on Disarmament (CD). The speaker highlighted the measures to prevent the proliferation of biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons as well as India's interests and impediments to disarmament. Being Ambassador of India to Mexico, he talked extensively about India-Mexico relations and the bright prospects for bilateral cooperation in the future.

Detailed Report

The Chair, Ambassador Sujan R. Chinoy, Director General, MP-IDSA, began the discussion by welcoming the speaker and introducing the topic to the attendees. He emphasised the current significance of India-Mexico ties, as well as how both countries have participated in several regional conferences and have an increasing presence in Global Governance. Mexico offers India opportunities to expand international trade and investment, as well as collaborate on a global scale. The country enjoys an advantage in the Western Hemisphere due to its strategic position and function as a bridge between Latin America and North America. While geopolitical and national concerns have always hampered attempts at closer ties, the desire to be allies has always prevailed.

On international security, Ambassador Chinoy stated that Mexico has not always been supportive of India in international affairs, expressing concerns about nuclear non-proliferation and a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council. He did, however, underline Mexico's support for India's quest to join the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG). To bring India and Mexico together, an effective institutional structure, as well as economic and people-to-people networks, would be required. Because of its developing economic and manufacturing capabilities, Latin America is becoming a more important investment destination. For Latin American partner nations, India has enormous prospects for collaboration, commerce, and investment.

Ambassador Chinoy also mentioned Dr. Sanjay Rajaram, an Indian-born Mexican scientist who was recently awarded the Padma Bhushan by the Government of India for his lifelong efforts to promote world food security by increasing global wheat yield and generating superior wheat varieties. India benefited from this and implemented the Green Revolution, which increased food production and brought prosperity to several states while averting famine. After a brief comment on the two nations' increasing economic and cultural relations, he invited the speaker to comment on “India's Interest in Disarmament and International Security”, as well as “India-Mexico Relations”.

Ambassador Pankaj Sharma, currently Ambassador of India to Mexico, who served earlier as Permanent Representative to the Conference on Disarmament (CD), initiated the discussion concerning India's interests in disarmament and functioning of the CD, the sole multilateral disarmament treaty negotiating body in the world. The CD has been in deadlock for two decades as it fails to embark on any sort of negotiations. In its search for parity with India, Pakistan is blocking the start of negotiations of a global halt to the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons. There is a deep frustration over its lack of progress such that a number of countries have even spoken about disbanding the CD. Ambassador Sharma observed that after the 2015 failure, the NPT Review Conference in August will be yet another failure. He gave two explanations for this. One factor would be the countries' inability to establish a Middle East Nuclear Weapons-Free Zone. The second would be non-nuclear weapon nations' dissatisfaction with the P-5 countries that they have been unable to disarm.

Ambassador Sharma highlighted that the challenges in negotiations reflect some of the concerns of respective bloc positions and key actors in the negotiation process. For instance, majority of non-nuclear weapon member states prioritise disarmament- by banning all nuclear weapon testing either for the purpose of safety, or modernisation, or developing new nuclear weapons and technologies. Nuclear Weapon States, on the other hand, want to maintain their nuclear deterrence posture, while limiting possibility for new states to cross the nuclear threshold- ‘stop countries on the learning curve’. Regional security consideration is another imperative priority that has repercussions for a comprehensive treaty on test ban, for example in case of India-Pakistan.

In terms of Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), Ambassador Sharma underlined that the United States has been sceptical of the BWC verification since its inception. He opined that the future of the BWC seems to be a long and difficult process of trying to find ways of strengthening the Convention against a background of different perspectives on what is at stake. The recent Review Conference held in 2016 could not reach a common agreement and was a failure. He added that there is limited hope from the BWC Review Conference in the coming years as Iran is not going to allow any progress on BWC till the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) gets sorted out.

Ambassador Sharma spoke about the Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space (PAROS) Treaty in the later part of his talk. Every year, a PAROS resolution is presented to the UN General Assembly and supported by a large majority of member countries. With the exception of the United States and Israel, most countries vote in favour of discussions on a PAROS Treaty. The UK is leading the global discussion on what responsible behaviour in space looks like. India pointed out it was an ominous concept but since the open ended working group was formed through a vote, India could not do so, and had abstained on the vote.

On the topic of Lethal Autonomous Weapons (LAWs), the speaker appreciated the efforts taken by ‘Campaign to Stop Killer Robots’, a coalition of civil society groups, for a ban on the development, production, and use of fully autonomous weapons. The US has come out with an international code of conduct on LAWs. In his concluding remarks, he noted that as researchers in international security, one should be wary of the Chinese resolution on Promoting International Cooperation on Peaceful Uses in the Context of International Security.

India –Mexico Relations

Ambassador Sharma reiterated that India-Mexico relations are on an upward trajectory with two high level visits in last few months. He highlighted how Foreign Minister Marcelo Ebrard, after his visit to India in March 2022, has suggested a million-dollar accelerator fund for start-ups and science and technology innovation, which will be matched by the Indian side. So there will be a $2 million fund based on the India-Israel research and development model. He added that India and Mexico are also keenly working on direct air connectivity. He noted the development of an India-Mexico Friendship Garden, an organic garden on the grounds of the Mexican Parliament. It has also been decided to build an India-Mexico friendship garden in Mexico's Olympic Stadium, which will host the FIFA World Cup in 2026. Ambassador Sharma ended his remarks on a positive note, mentioning that both nations had also signed bilateral agreements on extradition, investment promotion and protection, space cooperation, and administrative assistance in customs matters. The Chair applauded the Ambassador’s efforts to advance India-Mexico cooperation.

Discussion and Key Takeaways

The talk was followed by a lively Q/A session, with many of the concerns focused on how the major UN member states are not attempting to make serious efforts in disarmament negotiations, as well as the future of several disarmament regimes (Wassenaar Arrangement, Australia Group, NSG, etc.) as calls for their disbandment grew. There was also discussion on how the G-20 can play an essential role in addressing disarmament issues and developing the India-Mexico partnership. The relationship between China and Mexico, as well as the current Prime Minister's remarks on China's expanding involvement in the area, were also highlighted. In terms of space cooperation, given the former's advantage in the field, India may be an inevitable partner for Mexico. With Mexico being a member of the Coffee Club or Uniting for Consensus (UfC), India does not have high aspirations from the Mexican side on UNSC reforms.

The Chair concluded the session by acknowledging and praising the Speaker for his impassioned and intelligent address. He also emphasised how India should learn from Mexico in terms of sanitation and booming tourism, and he concluded on a hopeful note, stating that Ambassador Sharma may play a pivotal role in enhancing India-Mexico ties in the future.

The report was prepared by Ms. Bulbul Prakash, Research Intern, ALACUN centre, MP-IDSA.

Monday Morning Meeting on Japan’s Domestic Discourse on Security August 22, 2022 Titli Basu 1000 hrs Monday Morning Meeting

Executive Summary

2022 remains a decisive year for Japan due to the publication of Tokyo’s Revised Version of the National Security Strategy later this year. Discourses in Tokyo mainly focus on the resurgence of the Great Power Competition and Japan's counterstrike capability. The region is experiencing an emerging shift in how the Japanese public perceives security. Tokyo’s perception of China and Russia has also witnessed a major shift, with Japan increasing aligning itself with the G7. In the Korean Peninsula, while relations with North Korea have witnessed mounting tensions, relations with Seoul are on an upward trajectory.

India has positioned itself as a priority nation and a crucial node in Japan’s Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) framework.

Detailed Report

Dr. Prashant Kumar Singh introduced the topic of the Monday Morning Meeting by bringing to light the recent publication of Japan's Defence White Paper. He also discussed the recently issued Defence of Japan 2022 Digest by Japan, which mainly focused on how the world community is currently experiencing its worst crisis since World War II and how Taiwan has evolved into a critical reference point for strategic competition between the US and China.

Dr. Titli Basu was given the floor by the moderator after the brief introduction.

The speaker initially delved into the positive posture of Japan since late Mr. Shinzo Abe’s administration. She also noted that 2022 was a decisive year for Japan due to the publication of Tokyo’s Revised Version of National Security Strategy later this year, discussions on which are still going on. The speaker added that the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) appears to be considering realistic national security options as the strategic environment in the region has changed. She mentioned that the first National Security Strategy of Japan was released in 2013, predating events like the COVID-19 Pandemic, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the resurgence of QUAD, and the US-China Strategic Competition. It dates back to a period when the Free and Open Indo-Pacific was yet to become a dominant theme in the strategic lexicon.

Dr. Basu went on to discuss the patterns in the literature produced by the top Japanese think tanks and laid out the empirical evidence supporting that literature.

According to her, the main theme was the resurgence of Great Power Competition, which included both the strategic rivalry between the US and China and the US and Russia. Japan is also a participant in this Great Power Competition as a security treaty ally of the United States. She also looked at the prevalent themes in Japanese media. Several issues are appearing in Japanese media, including the discussion about Japan's counterstrike capability, whether to follow the NATO model on nuclear sharing and the topic of doubling defence spending in a 5-year time frame. In this case, Dr. Basu noted that, beneath the surface, there is uncertainty concerning the roadmap and the source of the funding, keeping in mind Japan's fiscal situation.

The region is cautiously watching what kind of Japan they will have to deal with as Japan begins rewiring some of the national security components of its National Security Strategy. This is because the East Asia region, where Japan is located, has multiple dynamics at play, such as contested territorial claims, a toxic history in domestic politics, and a high degree of nationalism.

Dr. Basu further noted that the year 2022 is a particularly challenging year for Japan because of the passing of the Late former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, one of the key figures at the forefront of the country's national security discussion. Speaking on the unfortunate assassination, the speaker emphasised Abe’s active involvement in influencing the domestic political discourse on Taiwan-related matters. Former PM Abe also advocated a national discussion on nuclear sharing arrangement with the US. This caused waves in domestic politics and prompted the publication of future public opinion polls. About 80% of respondents, according to some polls, believe that there should be a national discussion on nuclear sharing arrangements with the United States. In this regard, Dr. Basu noted that former PM Abe’s assassination is irreparable damage not only to the discussion on national security but across the spectrum.

Speaking about how security experts are approaching the issue, the speaker made the observation that some of the more serious writings are less concerned with whether Japan should have these nuclear sharing agreements and more about whether the current NATO model is the best one to follow or whether they should come up with some sort of arrangement that is more specific to the US-Japan Security Alliance. The lack of a unified command structure and the operational challenges are also prominent topics of discussion.

Moving further, the speaker elaborated on the emerging shift in how the Japanese public perceives security, focusing particularly on how, compared to a decade ago, the public has grown more realistic and informed about security issues. Dr. Basu referenced a Nikkei Asia opinion poll in which almost 74% of the Japanese respondents said that Japan should participate in efforts to stabilise the Taiwan Strait. Additionally, numerous polls from various newspapers across the political spectrum reflect similar viewpoints. The centre-right poll by Yomiuri Shimbun revealed that 70-72 per cent of respondents said Japan should improve its defence capability. Similar findings from the left-leaning paper The Asahi Shimbun revealed that 64-65 per cent of respondents thought Japan should improve its defence capability. The speaker also noted that Prime Minister Kishida’s approval rating was consistently high following his stance on the Russian invasion, indicating that the Japanese public approved of it.

Speaking on Tokyo's China Strategy, the speaker said that the 2013 National Security Strategy document termed Tokyo’s relationship with Beijing as a ‘Mutually Beneficial Relationship based on Common Strategic Interests.’ Japan opposes a Sino-Centric Regional Order. She mentioned the opinions of some of the top researchers in China in this context. For instance, one opinion is that China changed the status quo by becoming stronger, and Japan and US changed the status quo by becoming weaker.

The speaker emphasised the post-pandemic trend of increased discussion on economic security and spoke about Japan's leadership position in this sector due to the presence of a full-time minister for economic security. She made a point to underline that in this situation, economic security does not imply a decoupling from China.

A central tenet of Japan’s China discussion is the Taiwan issue. Wherever he went, whether it was to NATO or the G7, Prime Minister Kishida conveyed the same message: Is ‘Ukraine today may be East Asia tomorrow.’ The subject of Taiwan, the speaker pointed out, had already taken centre stage the year before, as Taiwan was featured in the 2021 Defence White Paper. She added that the LDP's Taiwan Project Group will look for further ways to engage with Taiwan. Additionally, Japanese security experts are considering what operational plans the US-Japan Security Alliance might have as they become increasingly certain that China is determined to reunify Taiwan.

Dr. Basu also underscored the Japanese discourse following the Speaker of the US House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi’s visit. She spoke of tremendous camaraderie at the political level, but academically, there were concerns about the strategic significance of this visit since some believed it was a pretext for China to escalate and make this a standard practice.

Speaking on Japan’s Russia Policy, Dr. Basu stressed that there is a complete reversal of former PM Abe's Russia Outreach. Japan now aligns with the G7, and Russia regards Japan as an unfriendly country. The effectiveness of economic sanctions is also a topic of discussion within the Japanese strategic community, as well as whether there might be a more effective approach to exert pressure, besides sanctions.

As the presentation drew to a close, the subject of Japan’s threat assessment from North Korea was covered, before moving to Japan’s relations with India. The speaker said that when it comes to North Korea, Pyongyang's advancements in nuclear and missile technology are the biggest worry for the Japanese. She also added that relations with South Korea, which is an important part of the trilateral arrangement that the US has with its Northeast Asian allies in terms of dealing with the Korean peninsula, were good.  

The 2013 National Security Strategy released by Japan lists India as a priority nation. She pointed out that there is general agreement in policy documents and the most recent Defence White Paper on the subject of India, that New Delhi is crucial to the FOIP framework and that India is given space in their policy papers.

After the speaker brought her presentation to a close, the moderator thanked her for her insightful remarks and opened the floor to questions and comments from the audience.

Key Takeaways from the Q&A Session

The question-and-answer session brought to light many viewpoints based on a thorough assessment of the matter presented during the discussion. Following are a few of the key points raised during the session:

  • The conversation explored the connections between the present domestic debates and the government's Taiwan policies. The possibility that Japan would modify its relations with Taiwan in the case of a war between China and the United States.
  • Numerous discourses on the term 'Strategic Ambiguity' were examined in relation to the One China policy implemented by East Asian nations.
  • The nature of the debates surrounding pre-emptive strikes and Japan's direct involvement were discussed.
  • A connection was made between the potential fall of Taiwan and the consequences for Japan.
  • Avoid excessively securitising India's connection with Japan.
  • Possibility of India becoming Japan's most significant economic partner was explored.
  • Inability to effectively counter Chinese expansionism with substantial measures without economic decoupling.
  • It was observed that by remaining silent about the economic blockade, we are encouraging China to engage in similar acts in the future, despite the fact that the semiconductor industry may be affected.
  • The discussion delved into the possibility of interpretation of Japanese counterattack capabilities as a credible second-strike capability.
  • Changes in Japan's perception of the threat posed by China during the previous decade were examined, along with corresponding changes in the terminology used to define the threat and security situation.
  • Domestic discourse on nuclear sharing with the USA.
  • Identification of Africa as a growing strategic security concern for Japan within domestic discourse.

The Report was prepared by Ms. Esha Banerjee, Intern, East Asia Centre, MP-IDSA.

East Asia
Report: Talk by Dr. Bilveer Singh on "The Islamic State and South East Asia- the State of Play" July 15, 2022 1000 hrs Talk

The interaction was held on 15 July 2022 and the session was chaired by the Director-General, Ambassador Sujan Chinoy. Deputy Director-General Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi (Retd.) and research faculty from the institute were also present. The topic for discussion was “ASEAN-India Partnership in an Era of Rising China”, and the speaker was Professor (Dr.) Bilveer Singh from Department of Political Science, National University of Singapore.

Executive Summary:

The interaction was useful in understanding Southeast Asian perspectives of India, particularly Singapore. The region of Indo-Pacific is poised for large-scale development and growth but will also face challenges due to geopolitical rivalry. The ASEAN nations are vulnerable and fear getting caught between China and the US. States such as Singapore invest heavily in areas of human resource development, research and innovation, finance and emerging technologies, to maintain its leadership role in the region. The influence of China, economic and military, is too pervasive for Southeast Asian states to successfully resist. 

Detailed Report:

The session began with Ambassador Chinoy’s welcome remarks addressed to Dr. Singh, and his introduction to the audience. Dr. Singh has studied comparative politics, aadicalisation and counter-terrorism, security policy of Indonesia, and Singapore’s foreign policy. Ambassador Chinoy outlined the relationship between India and ASEAN, and highlighted the deep historical and cultural linkages between the two regions. India and Southeast Asia have interacted with each other’s states and peoples since centuries and in a number of ways including trade and business, spirituality and religion, and politics and diplomacy. It also has had influences from China, which had been the other large civilisation in the proximity, and the Gulf region, from where Islamic influence came by the way of trade. Amidst all these external influences, Southeast Asian nations have developed a distinct identity and culture, and hold their own political worldview.

Ambassador Chinoy posed some questions for the speaker and the audience such as tackling of China, and India’s options in that regard, the focus on trade or defence in its relations with Southeast Asia, India’s role and approach to the South China Sea issue etc. Dr. Singh acknowledged the deep footprints of India in the culture and society of Southeast Asia. He started to explain the current scenario of China’s relations with the region. Countries like Singapore have felt the pressure from China in context to their engagements with the US. Even as ASEAN wishes to remain neutral in this power struggle between the two superpowers, it becomes increasingly vulnerable. China’s growing naval capacities and frequent incursion into the maritime territories of ASEAN nations is well-known. It has ramped up insecurities among these ASEAN nations that are also claimant states in the South China Sea dispute such as Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia and Brunei.

The situation in Singapore is particularly intensifying. The racial undertones in the Singaporean society may be becoming more explicit with increasing tensions among large powers outside the country. Singapore’s relations with Taiwan are also a matter of concern and could potentially become a flashpoint for crisis in the region. Given the geopolitical push and pull faced by Singapore, its relations with India are of significance. India’s vast experience in counter-terrorism can be a major area of cooperation with Southeast Asia. Trade relations between the two sides are already strong but have much more potential. India’s increasing participation in the security dynamics of the region through the Quad, and bilateral cooperation will help maintain balance of power in the Indo-Pacific, as it may be becoming less stable.

The audience also had some questions on the subject of discussion. In response to a query about whether China may attack Taiwan, Dr. Singh clarified that such a turn of events is unlikely although not entirely unthinkable. A lot may depend upon the internal politics of Taiwan and which party may come to power. Some factions in Taiwan may be more receptive to Beijing’s influence than others. However, Taiwan’s economy is highly dependent on China which limits its strategic maneuverability to a large extent. In response to a query on demographics of Singapore, Dr. Singh replied that a majority Chinese population has been the convention and the elite may not be in favour of changing or diluting that despite no constitutional obligation. Dr. Singh believed that to counter Chinese influence, it is important for countries in the region to radically upgrade defence cooperation and joint military training. ASEAN states like Singapore will continue to hedge among large powers in the region to ensure a vibrant economy and reliable security. The role of the US in that regard becomes important but it is unclear how much can Washington commit to the region in the face of changing and unstable politics in its own domestic landscape. 

The report was prepared by Mr. Akash Sahu, Research Analyst, Southeast Asia and Oceania Centre, MP-IDSA.

Monday Morning Meeting on Role of Financial Regulation as an Instrument of Comprehensive National Power September 05, 2022 1000 hrs Monday Morning Meeting

Mr. Pradeep S. Gautam, Former Research Fellow, Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (MP-IDSA), spoke on “Role of Financial Regulation as an Instrument of Comprehensive National Power” at the Monday Morning Meeting held on 5 September 2022. The session was chaired by Col. (Dr.) D.P.K. Pillay, Research Fellow, Ambassador Sujan R. Chinoy, Director General, MP-IDSA, Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi (Retd.), Deputy Director General, MP-IDSA, and scholars of the institute were in attendance.

Executive Summary

Comprehensive National Power (CNP) can be understood as the ability of a country to achieve its national objectives. Viewed as such, it is a function of its economy, polity, military, etc. On the one hand, thinkers like Michael Porter define CNP as the capacity of the country to mobilise resources, including economic resources, human capital, government spending, and international resources. All the above capacities mobilise economic resources and play a pivotal role in determining the CNP of a country. On the other hand, financial regulations facilitating the protection of private property and the rule of law have historically enhanced economic prosperity and hence are crucial for long-term growth in CNP.

Detailed Report

After briefly introducing the topic, the chair invited Mr. Gautam to deliver his remarks. The speaker began by underlining the definition of CNP. Following this, he discussed the significance behind India’s Income Tax department’s logo, which says “Kosh Mulo Dandah.” Taken from Arthashastra, it means treasury or taxation is the backbone of administration or state power.

Mr. Gautam shed light on how some of the economic policies formulated in the post-independence era failed to fully align with India’s national goals of rapid capital accumulation.  Then he discussed the relationship between state power and symbols of economic prosperity by taking certain examples. He retraced the developments during the Mughal era, where he emphasised that until Aurangzeb’s reign, the dynastic rule was considered powerful due to the credibility attached to the currency – gold and silver coins. Till Aurangzeb’s time, Mughal gold coins enjoyed higher status and were accepted at par by the East India Company and kings of South India. Post that period, there was a rapid decline in the quality of Mughal gold coins and Mughal power.

Delving into this issue further, Mr. Gautam argued that autocratic and authoritative rulers are at times followed by rapid state power decline. The reason for the same is found in the autocrats’ unchecked powers to tax and wage wars. This undermined private property, led to wastage and loss of capital, and eventually, capital flight. He highlighted this by pointing out how Kautilya’s Arthashastra equated a tax collector’s role to a honeybee that extracts nectar and pollinates the flowers. Further emphasising the point, he moved to discuss the workings of pre-industrial Europe. First, strong autocratic tendencies in Spain led to capital shifting to Amsterdam and then pre-industrial England, which provided better protection to private property and where the power of the monarch was kept in check. England, being based on common law, also provided better legal protection to creditors.

According to the speaker, a financial and legal innovation also facilitated this shift in the form of limited liability joint stock companies. These limited liability companies helped mitigate risk inherently involved in international trade and exploration in that era. However, he also said that religion might also have a role in this shift as Spain being predominantly catholic, did not promote charging interest on capital. This might have further led the capital flight to Amsterdam and England and led to the growth of the banking sector in those protestant countries which do not have such strong ideological baggage.   

While addressing the audience, the speaker explained that the world is currently in an advanced stage of financialisation, and there is scope for capital accumulation to begin in relatively underdeveloped markets like India.

Financial regulations facilitating better creditor protection and private property may facilitate this capital accumulation. Under the current Indian Government, legislations like the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Act have tried to give better creditor protection and resolve disputes relatively speedily. This is a significant improvement from the era where laws and institutions like Sick Industrial Companies Act and Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction largely prevented the dissolution of non-profitable businesses, locking creditors in long disputes and capital in unproductive ventures.

Finally, the speaker emphasised the need for a global financial center in India to further accelerate capital accumulation. He laid out key features which may make a successful global financial centre: -

a) Whether it is a vibrant, livable city
b) Whether the tax structure is reasonable
c) Whether it is open to receiving and taking out capital and making profits
d) Whether the city is a hub of economic activities and serves a domestic market

After the speaker concluded his presentation, the chair opened the floor for a question-and-answer session.

Some crucial themes were raised by the audience, including how conflicts are also an important reason why capital moves from one place to another. The Director General highlighted Benjamin Franklin’s quote about the certainty of death and taxes. He further raised issues regarding how CNP is calculated and the subjectivity involved. Furthermore, the role of immigration, individual nation-states’ policies concerning this issue, and their collective impact on their CNP were also deliberated.

Finally, the pace of the Indian economy, stability of the existing business model, the correlation between a country’s military might and its ability to tax a multi-national corporation, the feasibility of setting up an international financial centre in India, and its perception of being an attractive centre of financial capital were some of the other critical issues discussed during the meeting.

This report was prepared by Ms. Saman Ayesha Kidwai, Research Analyst, Counter-Terrorism Centre, MP-IDSA.

Monday Morning Meeting on Assessing India's Non-Permanent Membership at the UN Security Council August 29, 2022 1000 hrs Monday Morning Meeting

Dr. Rajeesh Kumar, Associate Fellow, Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (MP-IDSA), spoke on "Assessing India's Non-Permanent Membership at the UN Security Council” at the Monday Morning Meeting held on 29 August 2022. The session was chaired by Ms. Ruchita Beri, Senior Research Associate, MP-IDSA. Ambassador Sujan R. Chinoy, Director General, MP-IDSA, Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi (Retd.), Deputy Director General, MP-IDSA, and scholars of the Institute were in attendance.

Executive Summary

The discussion centred on two issues. The first is India's presidency of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), and how India contributed to expanding the UNSC agenda. The second theme emphasised was India's voting response in the United Nations Security Council on a variety of issues, including peacekeeping, terrorism, peace and security, and conflicts in Afghanistan, the Middle East, and Africa.

Detailed Report

The speaker focused much of his remarks on India's one-and-a-half-year tenure (India joined the UNSC in January 2021) as a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). He highlighted that India's membership comes at a time of rising tensions between superpowers within and outside the Security Council, posing a significant challenge to India. The speaker emphasised the significance of India's performance in the UNSC by offering an outline of India's previous UNSC terms.

For the 2021–22 UNSC term, India's primary objective in the UNSC was to implement a new orientation for a reformed multilateral system. This approach was guided by Prime Minister Modi's five ‘S’s- samman (respect), samvad (dialogue), sahyog (cooperation), shanti (peace), and samriddhi (prosperity). India had also identified five priorities for the term: seeking responsible and inclusive solutions, result-oriented measures to counter international terrorism, reforming multilateralism to reflect contemporary realities of global politics, streamlining peacekeeping operations, and technology with a human touch. 

India held three signature events after it acceded to the UNSC presidency in August 2021. The open debate on maritime security was followed by debates on peacekeeping operations and counterterrorism. Prime Minister Narendra Modi presided over the high-level discussion on maritime security, making him the first Indian Prime Minister to do so. It was the first standalone discussion on maritime security in the UNSC and the meeting adopted the first presidential statement on this issue. During the discussion, India also proposed five principles for discussion.

The open debate on counterterrorism was chaired by India’s External Affairs Minister, Dr. S. Jaishankar. The Minister reiterated that counter-terrorism is a priority for India, which has been the victim of major terror attacks. He also emphasised the need for the early adoption of a UN Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism for future global counter-terrorism efforts. The open debate on peacekeeping produced a presidential statement and a resolution on accountability for crimes against peacekeepers. The statement recognised the role of technology in peacekeeping and proposed using operationally proven cost-effective, and environment-friendly technologies. 

Dr. Kumar added that an important issue that coincided with the Indian presidency was the Taliban's takeover of Afghanistan. As Council President, India organised a briefing, released two press statements condemning the terrorist attacks, and introduced a resolution to address the Afghan problem. Resolution 2593 was passed, according to which, Afghan territory should not be used to threaten or attack any country, to house or train terrorists, or to support a terrorist organisation. India has also urged for an inclusive regime that represents all sections of Afghan society. 

Ukraine was another important issue which came to the UNSC during India’s current stint. Dr. Kumar argued that India’s approach to the Ukrainian crisis showed its independent and neutral foreign policy. Since February 2022, the UNSC convened 13 meetings on the Ukraine issue and in all these meetings India has consistently called for restraint on all sides. On February 25, when the UN Security Council considered a draft resolution tabled by Albania and the US, demanding Russia's immediate and unconditional withdrawal from Ukraine, India, along with China and the United Arab Emirates, abstained. India called for an immediate de-escalation of violence and hostility and requested the opposing parties to return to the path of diplomacy. On February 27, India again abstained from voting on a UNSC resolution to refer the Ukraine crisis to the General Assembly. Later in March, India, along with 12 other UN Security Council members, abstained on a resolution by Russia on the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine. On August 24, Russia called for a procedural vote on whether to allow Ukraine’s President to address the UNSC, via video conferencing. At the procedural vote, India once again abstained.

Dr. Kumar noted that 88 UN resolutions have been enacted since 2021, with India voting in favour of 81 of them. In other words, as a non-permanent member of the UNSC, India backed more than 90% of the resolution. In 2021, 57 resolutions were passed, with India supporting 54 of them. Two proposed resolutions were not adopted by the Council. One was on Bosnia and Herzegovina, in which India abstained, and the other was on climate and security, in which India voted against. In 2022, 31 resolutions were adopted, 27 of which India supported, and 5 of which India did not support. Almost half of the resolutions during the term were related to Africa (42 resolutions) and India has supported 40 out of these 42 and abstained from two that were related to conflicts in Sudan and South Sudan. On Ukraine, four resolutions were adopted where India supported one and abstained from the remaining three resolutions.

Dr. Kumar also stated that India's voting history demonstrates that the country has always opted to be part of the democratic majority, assisting in the adoption of broadly acceptable decisions and resolutions. It has only used abstentions to express its reservations regarding a specific issue. India has endeavoured to prioritise a political approach to crisis resolution through dialogue and negotiation. Finally, as a non-permanent member of the UNSC, India has always demonstrated maturity, flexibility, principles, and pragmatism. So India's approach, together with its presidency and working responses on various issues, demonstrated some level of maturity in the UNSC, and India also pushed for its permanent membership in the UNSC.

Comments and Questions

Ms. Ruchita Beri asked the speaker about the current and future relevance of the UN Security Council as the global body dealing with international security. Ambassador Sujan Chinoy, during the discussion, explicated the archaic and undemocratic nature of the UNSC. There have also been concerns raised about UN Security Council reforms, India's position on women, peace, and the security agenda, and the draft resolution that linked climate change to global security challenges.

The discussion ended with a vote of thanks by the Chair.

The report was prepared by Ms. Bulbul Prakash, Intern, ALACUN Centre, MP-IDSA.

MP-IDSA News [+]

Africa, Latin America, Caribbean & UN

Pages

Top