BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//MP-IDSA - ECPv6.15.12.2//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://idsa.in
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for MP-IDSA
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Asia/Kolkata
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0530
TZOFFSETTO:+0530
TZNAME:IST
DTSTART:20100101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20110303T053000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20110303T053000
DTSTAMP:20261104T201336
CREATED:20231223T220738Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231224T130742Z
UID:63593-1299130200-1299130200@idsa.in
SUMMARY:Interaction with Secretary National Security Council of Armenia Mr. Artur Baghdasaryan
DESCRIPTION:On March 3\, 2011\, the Secretary of Armenia’s National Security Council H.E. Mr. Artur Baghdasaryan addressed a select group of scholars at the Institute and participated in the roundtable discussion that followed. He was accompanied by Armenia’s Ambassador to India H.E. Mr. Ara Hakobyan and a high level delegation from Armenia. The meeting was chaired by Mr. N.S. Sisodia\, Director General\, IDSA. \nA range of issues was discussed – covering India-Armenia relationship\, developments in the Arab world\, Armenia’s foreign policy and relations with neighbours\, European Union membership\, the energy question and Armenia’s role in regional and global politics. \nMs. Purushottam initiated the proceedings by highlighting the friendly relationship that India has had with Armenia\, a country which has been a supporter of India’s core interests. The geographical location of the country\, situated at the juncture of West and East\, and sharing borders with Turkey\, Georgia\, Azerbaijan and Iran gave it an interesting vantage point from which to observe developments in the region\, in East-West relations and even in the West Asian region. \nMr. Baghdasaryan briefly highlighted Armenia’s views on some key issues of global concern. He described the Armenia-India relationship as ‘warm and close’ and said that his country had always been supportive of India at the UN and other international bodies. There had not been a single occasion in the last twenty years (post the breakup of Soviet Union and the subsequent independence of Armenia) that the two states had had a divergent view on issues of mutual concern. He lauded India’s balanced foreign policy and complimented India’s understanding of Armenia’s role in the region. \nHe suggested that the two countries should try to build on from the strong foundations in the political relationship and diversify towards an all encompassing one with focus on business and security issues. He appreciated the initiative of the Indian foreign ministry to boost ties with Armenia. The visit of Armenian Foreign Minister to New Delhi was well appreciated and he hoped that the Armenian President’s forthcoming visit to India would catapult the relationship to greater heights. \nMr. Baghdasaryan said that Armenia is a dynamically developed country with a clear vision of its future. It is a member of the CSTO. Its geographical location has ensured that it is part of the eastern partnership programme with EU. It also has a partnership of peace agreement with NATO. This is a clear indication of Armenia being able to balance its ties with the most important players in the region: Russia\, USA and the EU.  \nArmenia has initiated negotiations with the EU as part of its application for associate membership of the EU. The mandatory reforms in line with the EU charter will have to be carried out across a broad spectrum of sectors numbering close to three hundred. Amongst them\, priority has been given to the political sector\, free trade\, legal issues\, security and justice. \nA comprehensive plan has been drawn up to implement the policy and this is where the National Security Council comes into the picture. It is also the sole body responsible for the restructuring of armed forces\, considered one of the best trained in the region.  \nArmenia has always followed a balanced foreign policy and full membership of the European Union remains a long term goal. It has established energy contacts with Iran over the supply and exchange of gas and electricity. Mr. Baghdasaryan explained the rationale behind Armenia’s growing relationship with Iran. Armenia is a landlocked country and if the Georgian war had continued\, Armenia would have faced severe food crisis because all its outlets except for Iran\, Nagorno Karabakh\, Georgia\, Turkey and Azerbaijan\, were closed. There was mutual understanding from all these key countries on the need for Armenia to rely on Iran. Armenia has large\, medium and small hydro power plants\, apart from atomic power plants wherein USA and Russia have made sizeable investments. Even Turkey has expressed keen interest in improving relations. All these developments have enabled Armenia to pursue a balanced foreign policy with the West and the Middle East. \nThe Director General of IDSA put forth India’s stance on the changing situation in Afghanistan. He highlighted the massive reconstruction plan that India has implemented which included building not just the infrastructure but also strengthening the democratic institutions in the country. The fact remained that a majority of Pakistan people do not view the Taliban as a threat and the prevalence of Taliban sympathizers in the Pakistani army had further complicated matters. This had acted as a serious roadblock in the establishment of some resemblance of peace and stability in the land north of Hindukush. He also expressed concern about the deteriorating situation in Pakistan as the recent political murders indicated that radicals were gaining an upper hand in the country. This was indeed very worrisome especially on account of Pakistan’s role in promoting terrorism in India. \nAt the request of the Director General\, Mr. Baghdasaryan went on to explain the unique composition and functions of the National Security Council of Armenia. The composition\, mechanisms and functions explained by were noted down for sharing with the National Strategy Project of IDSA. \nMr. Baghdasaryan called for Indian participation in some of the large infrastructure projects of Armenia since this would add a new dimension to the strong political ties between the two states. The International North South Transport Corridor (INSTC) and the Georgia-Iran-Armenia railway are the two big projects of Armenia. Armenia would like to tap into the Information Technology revolution of India and briefed the audience of India’s contribution in developing two IT centres in Armenia. He hoped that Indian companies would take note of the massive business opportunities\, including building oil pipelines and highways\, which are available in his country. There was a need to take the business relationship forward by establishing contacts with the business communities of the two countries.   \nThe highlight of the interaction was the general consensus amongst the eminent research scholars of IDSA and the Armenian delegation on the need for both countries to closely work together to solve problems of mutual concern. Mr. Baghdasaryan emphasized that the government of Armenia is focussed on research collaboration with research institutes worldwide. The Presidential administration and the defence ministry have made it a priority to initiate and motivate concrete research on key areas of national defence which include information security and strategic analysis. The entire state mechanism is closely linked to effectively coordinate and implement the strategic doctrine of the country.  \nArmenia would like to establish a mechanism with India for exchange of information on regional and international issues. The opening of direct flights between Yerevan and New Delhi had made it easier for cooperation to flourish. Both Mr. Sisodia and Mr. Baghdasaryan agreed that such roundtable conferences were indeed very useful and practical in keeping each other abreast of policy making in their respective countries. Mr. Baghdasaryan invited the Director General to visit Armenia.  \nReport prepared by Rajorshi Roy\, Research Assistant\, IDSA
URL:https://idsa.in/idsa-event/interaction-with-secretary-national-security-council-of-armenia-mr-artur-baghdasaryan
CATEGORIES:ROUND TABLES / WORKSHOPS,EVENT REPORT
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://idsa.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/no_photo-200x150-2.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20110309T053000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20110309T053000
DTSTAMP:20261104T201336
CREATED:20231224T111503Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231224T130742Z
UID:64506-1299648600-1299648600@idsa.in
SUMMARY:India-China Bilateral Trade Relations: A Comparative Analysis of Strengths and Weaknesses
DESCRIPTION:Venue: Committee Room No. 005 (Ground Floor)\, IDSA \nProgramme\nOpening Remarks (1030-1032 hrs): Brigadier Rumel Dahiya \nChair (1032- 1037 hrs):   Dr. R. N. Das \nSpeakers (1037-1237 hrs): \n\nMohan Guruswamy\, Chairman\, Centre for Policy Alternatives\nTK Arun\, Editor\, Opinion\, The Economic Times\nAlka Acharya\, Associate Professor\, JNU\nAmita Batra\, Associate Professor\, JNU  \nDebashis Chakraborty\, Assistant Professor\, IIFT (TBC)\nJoe Thomas Karackattu\, Associate Fellow\, IDSA\n\nQ&A (1237-1322 hrs) \nConcluding Remarks by Chair (1322-1332 hrs)
URL:https://idsa.in/idsa-event/india-china-bilateral-trade-relations-a-comparative-analysis-of-strengths-and-weaknesses
CATEGORIES:ROUND TABLES / WORKSHOPS
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://idsa.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/no_photo-200x150-2.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20110323T053000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20110323T053000
DTSTAMP:20261104T201336
CREATED:20231223T220723Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231224T130742Z
UID:63584-1300858200-1300858200@idsa.in
SUMMARY:Popular Uprisings in the Arab world
DESCRIPTION:Event Report\nThis discussion was organized against the backdrop of the recent Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia and the 18 day long protest in Egypt that overthrew the Hosni Mubarak regime that sent shockwaves throughout the Arab world. The success of popular protests in Tunisia and Egypt has encouraged people in neighbouring Arab countries like Libya\, Algeria\, Jordan\, Iraq\, Yemen\, Oman and Bahrain to protest against their authoritarian regimes demanding better economic conditions and political freedom in their countries. Moreover developments in the Arab world have sent tremors in the global oil market. The objective of this event was to discuss this critical issue in the Arab world and its implications for India. \nAmbassador Ishrat Aziz opened the discussion by pointing out the significance of the region to India – more than 70% of India’s oil imports come from the Gulf region; moreover\, over 5 million Indians currently reside in the West Asian countries. Professor P R Kumaraswamy\, Dr. P K Pradhan\, Ambassador K C Singh and Shri Saeed Naqvi presented their views on the ongoing situation.  \nProfessor P R Kumaraswamy noted that it is difficult to generalize outcomes for countries where protests have been taking place\, since each country is unique in its socio-political conditions\, degree of grievances and external interference. The case of neglected minorities in each of these countries is also a key factor in the rapidly changing situation in the region. He observed that the options for India to consider would have to revolve around developing a policy\, not just for individual countries in the region\, but towards the wider Gulf region. This is crucial while keeping in view the continuing instability that the region is expected to undergo.  \nDr P. K. Pradhan’s presentation focused on the details surrounding the uprisings that have taken place in the region so far – a number of Gulf countries such as Saudi Arabia and Kuwait announced cash and other welfare benefits to their citizens in the wake of street protests in Egypt\, Yemen\, Libya\, and Bahrain. The main question raised was how long these regional governments could find an economic solution to a political problem. Dr Pradhan also pointed out the main challenge for India was to protect the interests of the Indian diaspora in the region. An escalation in regional tensions would require mass evacuations of Indian citizens that could pose considerable difficulties as seen with the evacuation of 18\,000 Indian nationals from Egypt last month. He also touched upon the short and long term impacts of these protests; in the long term\, there will be a need for reconfiguring the ruler-ruled relationship in these countries\, with the people having more of a voice in the affairs of the state.  \nAmbassador K. C. Singh touched upon the importance of protecting the interests of Indian citizens living and working in the region\, drawing upon his experiences of serving there. He pointed out that India needed to take corrective steps to create greater employment within the country so that the Indian government’s policy towards the West Asia region is not held hostage to the interests of our nationals residing there\, in the event of crises such as the ongoing one. Also\, he observed that there would be four key states that would stand crucial in defining the balance of stability in the region in coming months – Iran\, Turkey\, Egypt\, and Saudi Arabia. Ambassador Singh made three recommendations on how India can respond to this situation keeping long term national interests in view: \n\nThis is a great opportunity for India to create a free zone (such as Dubai)\, on the west coast of the country\, situated outside the Gulf\, and in the Indian Ocean\, since there is a need to create another transit point for trade. \nIndia must reduce its dependence on laborers’ remittances from the Gulf region.\nDiversifying resources is important for India to advance its national interests in a rapidly changing world. India must engage more economically with countries like Iran and Brazil.\n\nShri Saeed Naqvi\, in addition to giving the participants a historical view on the current uprisings\, also observed that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would remain a defining factor in determining stability in the region. \nThe discussion that followed focused on the need for greater coherence in policy formulation for the West Asia region as a whole; the debate on this question revolved around if and how such formulation could take place when individual countries required unique policies to be framed. On the ongoing situation in Libya\, one of the questions touched upon the need for India to take a stronger stance on issues raised in the UN Security Council; this was discussed within the context of India’s decision on the UNSC Resolution 1973 to approve a no-fly zone over Libya. Also touched upon was the question of long-term implications of these protests on Iran\, the need to track developments in Syria keeping in view recent developments with and within Lebanon\, and demonstrations in Beirut last week. The importance of tracking developments in Egypt was also stressed; any new government in Egypt would have to decide on policies to be adopted vis-à-vis Israel and the Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations\, with Egypt having been a key player in the conflict\, both as a mediator and due to its shared border with the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip. \nThe Chair concluded the discussion by noting that the root cause of the uprisings in the region lies in the fact that no regional ruler has succeeded in creating an inclusive national identity and this will not happen without democratic governance and the state reflecting the voting equilibrium of the people. \nReport prepared by Princy Marin George\, Research Assistant\, IDSA \n\nConcept Note\nThe recent Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia and the 18 day long protest in Egypt that overthrew the Hosni Mubarak regime have sent shockwaves throughout the Arab world. The success of popular protests in Tunisia and Egypt has encouraged the people in the neighbouring Arab countries like Algeria\, Libya\, Jordan\, Iraq\, Yemen\, Oman and Bahrain to come out to the streets to protest against their authoritarian regimes demanding better economic conditions and political freedom in their countries. They have also raised issues like corruption\, unemployment\, poverty\, inequality\, police heavy handedness etc with their rulers. \nBeing nervous about the protests the region’s rulers\, in an ad hoc manner\, have announced some measures to appease the people. But these measures have failed to completely satisfy the people who are continuing with the protests. The rulers have tried to deal with the situation tactfully\, (albeit Libya whose leader Muammar Gaddafi has ordered use of force against the protesters killing over 300 people)\, offering economic concessions\, dialogues with the opposition and promises for a better future. Though usually authoritarian in nature and deal with the popular discontents strictly\, the regimes have applied restraint in using force against the demonstrators and have attempted to show a people-friendly face to the world.   \nThe continuing protests raise the question of political legitimacy and stability in the Arab world. The leaders of the region have been suffering from acute legitimacy deficit\, and the growing frustration of the people further deepens that feeling among the people. With people openly questioning the ability and legitimacy of the rulers\, the unsettled issues may lead to further internal instability in the countries. Similarly the issues of democracy\, human rights and broader questions of equality in the region are also of primary importance to be negotiated between the rulers and the ruled. Poverty and unemployment are other important instigators for the protests. The Arabs have been witnessing the rising economic inequality in their countries with the leaders living luxurious lives spending huge amount of national wealth.  \nWith such huge inequality and discontent prevailing among the people\, the popular protests seemed obvious. While the Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia provided the initial spark\, success in Egypt became a strong motivator for others to take on to the streets. Needless to say\, the use of internet and the social networking sites have become the primary means of communication to spread the message.  \nIt is still not clear which way the developments in the Arab world would move. But the popular discontent would certainly leave its mark in the Arab politics. At present\, countries like Libya and Yemen are finding it particularly tough to deal with the protesters. The relationship between the ruler and the ruled\, social inequality\, democracy\, human rights and so on would resurface in future if not dealt with properly by the rulers. Till now\, the protests have been able to dethrone two autocrats from the power: Ben Ali of Tunisia and Hosni Mubarak of Egypt. Muammar Gaddafi is in real trouble with slowly loosing parts of his country to the rebels and the United Nations Security Council imposing sanctions on the country.  It is only a matter of time before Gaddafi goes.  \nThe developments in the Arab world will have its definite effect on India. Firstly\, the safety of the Indian nationals living in those countries is of primary concern for Government for India. There are around 18000 Indians in Libya\, 14\,000 in Yemen and more than 350000 Indians in Bahrain. India facilitated return of its nationals from Egypt by sending special aircrafts to Cairo. India is also evacuating Indian nationals from Libya. Secondly\, the impasse in the Arab world threatens to increase the oil prices which will have its effect on India. Oil prices have already soared up since the protests began in Egypt. The spread of protests to the Gulf region and any sort of hindrances in the oil production and supply may lead to further increase in oil price for India as the Gulf countries are the major oil exporters for India. Thirdly\, in political terms\, India needs to prepare itself to deal with the new regimes\, if they emerge in the region. India must act consciously so that the political developments in the region do not negatively affect India’s relations and interests with the region.  \nIn this backdrop\, the Institute for Defence Studies and Analysis intends to hold a round table on this pressing issue to discuss the current situation in the Arab world and its implications for India.
URL:https://idsa.in/idsa-event/popular-uprisings-in-the-arab-world
CATEGORIES:ROUND TABLES / WORKSHOPS,EVENT REPORT
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://idsa.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/no_photo-200x150-2.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR