BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//MP-IDSA - ECPv6.15.12.2//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://idsa.in
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for MP-IDSA
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Asia/Kolkata
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0530
TZOFFSETTO:+0530
TZNAME:IST
DTSTART:20140101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20150508T053000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20150508T053000
DTSTAMP:20261104T160625
CREATED:20231223T133107Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250317T000341Z
UID:63076-1431063000-1431063000@idsa.in
SUMMARY:An Assessment of Organisational Change in the Indian Army
DESCRIPTION:Chairperson: Lt. Gen. Satish Nambiar (Retd.)\nExternal Discussants: Brig. Gurmeet Kanwal (Retd.)\, Brig. Rahul Bhonsle (Retd.)\nInternal Discussants: Gp. Capt. Ajey Lele (Retd.)\, Col. Vijai Singh Rana \nThe paper analysed military change in the context of the Indian Army\, with specific focus on organisational innovation and change. It specifically looked at two case studies – the restructuring of the army after the Sino-Indian war of 1962 and the drive towards mechanisation based on the 1975 expert committee recommendations. The paper then assessed the drivers for organisational change in the Indian Army\, with the further aim of deriving policy recommendations which could be apt in light of the ongoing transformation of the Indian Army. \nThe paper identified operational environment and technology as the principle drivers for change. It stated that successful change required supportive political leadership\, professional and visionary military leadership\, long-term strategic assessment\, strong institutional structures and follow up action. The author used the two case studies in relation to conventional threats. The first related to changes post 1962\, which led to an increase in the size of the army by almost 33 per cent. It also saw the raising of divisions which were tailored to the needs of mountain warfare. \nThe second case study assesses the 1975 committee recommendations which were successful in aiding the army’s drive towards mechanisation. Not only was the organisational structure transformed\, the resultant innovations had a lasting impact on the strategic thought of the army\, which continued to guide subsequent adaptations thereafter. The author also pointed to pertinent aspects related to organisational change after the 1999 Kargil conflict and Operation Parakram in 2001\, besides noting changes related to the ongoing transformation. \nMajor Points of Discussion and Suggestions to the Author\n\nIt was pointed out that political support for carrying out military change was very crucial. Top level political intervention was important to achieve unity of thought and unity of purpose. This was particularly relevant in the Indian context where turf war was a glaring feature of the armed forces and the absence of the Chief of Defence Staff affected unity of thought and action. It was noted that political leadership in India has been more than encouraging in this regard. Though lacking an institutional mechanism of interface between top political leadership and the armed forces\, many chiefs have successfully won over political support for bringing about organisational change.\nThe aim of military change should be to have a capability-based force and threat-based force existing simultaneously to deal with the challenges being posed in an era of strategic uncertainty.\nApart from operational environment and technology being drivers of change\, it was noted that post-1962\, changes were largely driven by doctrinal shift in thinking.\nA crucial area of military change related to professional military education and training. The aim of military education and training should be to train for certainty and educate for uncertainty to deal with broad military challenges and threats.\nThe absence of a national security strategy has led to the rise of service-specific doctrines\, which are linear in approach and lack a broad national outlook.\nThe sense of the house was that the Indian army fought bravely in the 1962 war. If not for some strategic miscalculations and a degree of misfortune\, Indian army would have turned the tables on the Chinese despite facing all odds. Moreover\, the engagement of Air Force would have significantly altered the course of the war. Most importantly\, the war did not shatter the morale of the Indian Army\, contrary to the common perception because our soldiers fought fearlessly and ferociously. It was largely the failure of top level military/political leadership. The Indian army would do well to look inward for its failures as this will pave the way for course correction.\nIt was suggested that the paper should look into the aspect of organisational change pertaining to staff. The teeth-to-tail ratio\, recruitment policy and restructuring of the organisation merited the attention of the author.\nThe nature of change should be analysed in order to understand whether change is reactive in nature or whether it was shaping the battlefield favourably.\nThe Kargil review committee was the first attempt at evolving a comprehensive national security system engaging all three services. The Krishna Rao report primarily dealt with the army. In an era of jointness\, efforts to bring about change in the army must find a resonance among the other services. A tri-service approach looking at change would bring far greater dividends than a service-specific approach. In this context\, post-Kargil reform process needed to be better analysed.\nThe Indian army aimed to achieve the capacity of network-enabled to network-centric warfare capability but has not been able to do so. It should be explored as to what are the reasons behind our inability to achieve this capability. Similarly\, the aspect of cyber warfare should be included in the paper to understand the phenomenon of change in its entirety.\n\nReport prepared by Amit Kumar\, Research Assistant\, IDSA.
URL:https://idsa.in/idsa-event/an-assessment-of-organisational-change-in-the-indian-army
CATEGORIES:FELLOW'S SEMINAR,EVENT REPORT
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://idsa.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/no_photo-200x150-2.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR