BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//MP-IDSA - ECPv6.15.12.2//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:MP-IDSA
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://idsa.in
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for MP-IDSA
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Asia/Kolkata
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0530
TZOFFSETTO:+0530
TZNAME:IST
DTSTART:20080101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20090306T053000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20090306T053000
DTSTAMP:20261105T003155
CREATED:20231223T222322Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231224T130250Z
UID:63715-1236317400-1236317400@idsa.in
SUMMARY:Benefits of India’s Defence Cooperation Initiatives towards the Foreign Policy Goals
DESCRIPTION:Chair: Arvind GuptaDiscussants: Anuradha Reddy and Sunil Kumar \nAfter the Cold War\, India’s foreign relations have become multi-directional and diversified. Growing realisation that international defence cooperation can supplement diplomatic initiatives towards issues of common interests is increasingly being acknowledged the world over. New geo-strategic realities necessitate improvement of relations with the major powers\, such as the US\, EU\, Russia\, Japan and China and pursuance of an active ‘Look East’ policy in the extended neighbourhood\, especially ASEAN countries.  \nAn important part of ‘Defence Diplomacy’ is defence cooperation. Defence cooperation\, as an important tool of foreign policy\, can be gainfully utilized to build bridges of friendship\, prevent conflict\, build capacity of friendly foreign nations\, strengthen mutual trust and enhance security and stability in the region.  \nConsidering the intensive range of defence cooperation activities\, it is considered prudent to analyse the role being played by defence cooperation activities\, especially military related\, towards pursuance of our overall foreign policy goals. The paper is an attempt to do this and is laid out in three parts as follows:- \n\n\nPerspective on Defence Cooperation. \nBenefits of Defence Cooperation. \nRecommendations for the future.\n\nIndia is now engaged in a wide range of activities with other friendly countries\, ranging from Chile and Brazil in the Far-West to Japan and Korea in the Far-East and has concluded suitable defence cooperation agreements with over 30 countries. Defence cooperation activities are not structured and conducted in isolation but as part of a larger process. The range of defence cooperation activities comprise of strategic security dialogues that enable understanding of the participant concerns and establishing areas of common interest. Also included are goodwill visits at the level of the Service Chiefs\, professional defence and military expert exchanges\, military training\, combined exercises\, reciprocal visits of warships\, observers for exercises\, sports and adventure activities\, disaster management and humanitarian assistance; and cooperation in UN Peace Keeping Operations.  \nThe recent period has seen increased instability and turbulence in India’s neighbourhood. With growing assertion of ‘non-state’ actors\, Pakistan is passing through yet another defining phase in its history. India’s other neighbours\, specifically Nepal\, Bangladesh\, Myanmar and Sri Lanka\, appear to be going through periods of instability\, which could have spillover effects on our security. Radicalisation of domestic environment in Bangladesh\, continuous inflow of illegal immigrants to North East India\, cross border movement of Indian insurgent groups from Bangladesh and Myanmar\, escalation of violence in Sri Lanka and effects of actions against LTTE in southern India are issues having ramifications on India’s security. While Nepal may be on the path to normalcy\, possibility of collusion between the Nepal Maoists and the Indian Naxalites has serious implications on India’s security.  \nTo ensure a peaceful periphery\, India has remained focused on security of sea lanes in the IOR\, responding to natural disasters\, stability in neighbourhood and\, where feasible\, capacity building of neighbouring countries to meet their internal challenges as also to contribute towards meeting common security challenges in the region. Towards this end\, defence cooperation activities are facilitating regional security (through material assistance\, training\, building ability to operate alongside and maritime bonding); building bridges of friendship with countries in the extended neighbourhood\, building bridges of friendship with key powers\, projection of India as a responsible player in the global security architecture\, Disaster Management and Humanitarian Relief\, Peacekeeping Operations\, combating sea piracy\, capacity building of own armed forces\, extending dividends to Defence Industry\, joint R&D projects\, confidence building and deterrence  \nSome of the recommendations to make it more effective and valuable are: Formulation of Policy Guidelines\, Integrated Planning\, Requirement of Specialists\, Improvement of Relations with West Asian Countries\, Military Interaction with Pakistan  \nPoints in the Discussion\n\nDefence cooperation is one part of India’s foreign policy. It is increasingly becoming an important component of India’s foreign policy. \nDefence cooperation is a component of our national security strategy. India needs to have clear national security strategy.\nDefence cooperation provides supporting role in building partnership with other countries. It also helps ensure regional security.\nIndia’s defence cooperation must also looks at meeting the needs of the friendly countries. \n\nPrepared by Dr. Amarjeet Singh\, Research Assistant at the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses\, New Delhi.
URL:https://idsa.in/idsa-event/benefits-of-indias-defence-cooperation-initiatives-towards-the-foreign-policy-goals
CATEGORIES:FELLOW'S SEMINAR,EVENT REPORT
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://idsa.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/no_photo-200x150-2.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20090306T053000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20090306T053000
DTSTAMP:20261105T003155
CREATED:20231223T222322Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231224T130250Z
UID:63716-1236317400-1236317400@idsa.in
SUMMARY:US Counter Insurgency Approach in Afghanistan Under Obama Administration: Does It Portend 'Change'?
DESCRIPTION:Chair: G. BalachandranDiscussants: Shakti Sinha\, K. C. Singh and Rahul Bhonsle \nAfghanistan today appears to be teetering on the brink of failure and unending chaos. Despite the military endeavour by the United States (US) and its allies\, under Operation Enduring Freedom for the last eight years\, violence in 2008 increased by 40 per cent over 2007 and almost 543 percent over 2005. The Taliban-led insurgency has spread and according to an estimate almost 70 per cent of the country have become “no-go areas for security forces\, government officials and aid workers” depicting a rapidly shrinking political and humanitarian space. In this context\, the paper reviewed the past US counter-insurgency approaches in Afghanistan and analysed the possible impact of a new Afghan strategy. Given India’s interest in long-term stabilization of Afghanistan\, this policy analysis is relevant in terms of preparing responses to the evolving scenario in that country. The central thesis of the paper was that the present initiatives in designing a new COIN (Counter Insurgency) approach for Afghanistan to usher in ‘change’ are inadequate to turn the tide.  \nUS COIN Approach under Bush administration \nThe inability of the international community to stabilise Afghanistan is clearly an outcome of the inadequate and short sighted policies of George W. Bush\, who embarked on the military campaign in Afghanistan with the objective of dislodging the Taliban and winning the war. The resurgence of Taliban in Afghanistan depicts that the US policy under President Bush of establishing security with a ‘light footprint’ and lack of focus on ‘nation-building’ has proved to be counter productive. Moreover\, at a critical juncture of Afghan stabilization efforts\, the already limited resources and manpower devoted to Afghanistan were shifted to Iraq. Despite the successful completion of the Bonn process and conducting successful presidential and parliamentary elections\, the political structures and the Parliament in Afghanistan are wracked by disruptive forces. \nInitiatives of the Obama administration: Break from the past\nWill they work?\nObama’s promise of ‘change’ from the previous administration’s unilateral policies\, his preference to replace blunt force with ‘diplomacy’ and ‘smart power’ is projected to have ramifications not only on Afghanistan but also for the entire South Asia.  \n(i) Establishing Security – The debate in the present administration on the need to establish security in Afghanistan has revolved around three policy options: (a) Troop Surge (b) Arming the tribal militia (c) Talks/Negotiations with the Taliban. \n(ii) Diplomacy and ‘Smart Power’ approach – Obama has promised a change by ending the war on terror. One of the first Presidential actions after taking office was ordering the closure of the controversial detention centre at Guantanomo Bay. This has been viewed positively at home and abroad. \n(iii) Pakistan- Issue of Sanctuary– Obama has maintained that the future US efforts “must refocus” on “Afghanistan and Pakistan — the central front in our war against Al Qaeda”. Sanctuaries on the Pakistan side of the Afghan-Pakistan border supply and train the assault on Afghanistan and the allied forces there. Moreover\, the Pakistani Taliban\, have expanded their sweep over a vast area of the country. \n(iv) Pressure tactics on Karzai – Members of the Obama administration have provided enough indications of backing an alternative candidate in the upcoming Afghan national elections. The decision is just not based on the fact that Karzai was a choice of the Bush administration\, but because of his inability to rein in rampant corruption\, the flourishing drug trade\, and the inability of his government to deliver basic services.  \n(v) Regional Strategy – The Obama administration has favoured a ‘comprehensive strategy’ that looks at the problem of Afghanistan regionally\, and that goes even beyond Pakistan and India but in some way takes into consideration the interests of Russia\, Iran\, and even China. \nThe paper assessed that there is not much change with the ushering of the new administration and most likely it would be a continuation of earlier policy. There are no bench marks and timeline for the ‘Exit strategy’ either. \nPolicy options for India\nIndia’s interests in Afghanistan are long term stability and building a ‘land bridge\,’ mentoring-ANA\, ANP\, COIN grid and fostering Capacity building-community projects. Obama administration’s policy of ‘troop surge’ or ‘negotiating with the Taliban’ would be viewed with greater interest by Indian policy makers in the post 26/11 Mumbai scenario. Unless troop surge is accompanied by ‘civilian surge’ the Afghans would resent the foreign troop presence. India needs to emphasise on an Afghan-led process of long-term institution building both in the security and governance sectors. India could contribute to capacity building and training of personnel (Afghan Army and police) but needs to steer clear from any direct military involvement in that country. The post 26/11 scenario calls for a better regional strategy to address the threat emanating from non-state actors operating from the Pakistan-Afghanistan border region. \nIssues raised in the discussion:  \n\nThere are two dimensions to the problem in Afghanistan- strategic depth and nation building. The situation is grim in that country but as far as nation building is concerned\, Afghans would themselves have to work towards it as no outsider would do it.\nMilitarism was dominant in George Bush’s policy and it was not a comprehensive approach.\nPresident Obama’s policy talks about a regional approach and India and China are important parts of this regional concept.\nThe primary reason for the unpopularity of the government in Afghanistan is lack of social development activities.\nVery often despondency is the tone when we talk about Afghanistan. The strategy of winning hearts and minds needs to be pursued. \nAfghanistan has become a competing space for great powers. There is lack of understanding of local cultures and absence of a social code.\nNATO’s presence in Afghanistan is in body and not in soul. The member countries of NATO come with a set of caveats and therefore there is lack of fruitful coordination.\nAs far as India’s role is concerned\, the larger question is how India would fit within the NATO framework.\nIndia should in fact adopt a more forward looking and proactive posture. However\, any decision by India to send troops to Afghanistan as part of a more proactive role should be properly assessed and its ramifications should be studied carefully. \nAs Afghanistan is also a member of SAARC\, India could offer it a larger bouquet of choices.\nPakistan is both a part of the Afghanistan problem and a solution to the problem.\nAfghanistan needs to have a force which is sustainable in its own budget.\nGreat nations and narrow minds do not work.\nAfghanistan problem cannot be solved in isolation and there is need for comprehensive engagement.\nThe role of SCO in the context of Afghanistan should also be considered while studying this problem.\nThe proposal regarding implementation of the Panchayati Raj system in Afghanistan may not be a feasible option.\n\nThe session was chaired by Dr. G. Balachandran. There were three external discussants: Shri K.C. Singh\, Shri Shakti Sinha and Brigadier (Retd.) Rahul Bhonsle. Dr. Rajiv Nayan and Captain Alok Bansal were the internal discussants.  \nPrepared by Dr. Priyanka Singh\, Research Assistant at the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses\, New Delhi.
URL:https://idsa.in/idsa-event/us-counter-insurgency-approach-in-afghanistan-under-obama-administration-does-it-portend-change
CATEGORIES:FELLOW'S SEMINAR,EVENT REPORT
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://idsa.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/no_photo-200x150-2.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR