BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//MP-IDSA - ECPv6.15.12.2//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:MP-IDSA
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://idsa.in
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for MP-IDSA
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Asia/Kolkata
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0530
TZOFFSETTO:+0530
TZNAME:IST
DTSTART:20130101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20140212T053000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20140212T053000
DTSTAMP:20261104T194703
CREATED:20231223T125534Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250308T023131Z
UID:62777-1392183000-1392183000@idsa.in
SUMMARY:United Nations Security Council Reform: Perspectives and Prospects
DESCRIPTION:Concept Note\nOver the years\, the world has changed in fundamental ways. We are witnessing a resurgence of Asia\, Africa and Latin America. Growth and development have not only made the countries more interdependent\, but new and increasingly complex challenges have also arisen. For multilateralism to remain relevant and effective in today’s world\, multilateral institutions must adapt and reform to reflect contemporary geo-political realities. \nNo multilateral body is more in need of reform than the United Nations Security Council which is still constituted in accordance with the geopolitical architecture of 1945. The lack of reform has affected the credibility and effectiveness of the Security Council as seen in a number of new crises afflicting the world. \nThe constituency for reforms has been increasing by the day. An overwhelming majority of countries have supported the demand for an urgent reform and expansion of the Security Council in both permanent and non-permanent categories of its membership. \nBrazil\, Germany\, India and Japan have come together on the platform of G-4 to pursue the much needed and urgent Security Council reform and to make it more broadly representative\, efficient and transparent and thus enhance its effectiveness and the legitimacy of its decisions. G-4 countries have reached out to all regional groups to find a path that will reflect the dominant call by Member States for a reform of the Security Council leading to an expansion in both categories of membership\, permanent and non permanent. The G-4 initiative enjoys broad and cross regional support. G-4 countries reaffirmed their view of the importance of developing countries\, in particular Africa\, to be represented in both the permanent and non-permanent categories of an enlarged Council. G-4 countries have also welcomed the initiative taken by the current President of the General Assembly\, H.E. John W. Ashe\, to issue a Non Paper which faithfully reflects the current status of the discussions in the past five years\, as a basis for text based negotiations in the 10th round of Intergovernmental Negotiations currently underway in New York. \nThe debate on expansion of the Council has been going on for a few decades with a consensus still eluding the international community. The time has now come to move ahead from words to action and take a decision on the way forward based on the wishes of majority of the UN membership. Given that world leaders agreed at the 2005 World Summit to achieve an ‘early’ reform of the Security Council\, it is imperative that the world community work together for a concrete result before the 70th anniversary Summit of the United Nations in 2015. \nG-4 countries have recognised the need for greater involvement of civil society\, the media and academia in the discussions on Security Council reform. In this context\, IDSA is organising a seminar on the “United Nations Security Council Reform: Perspectives and Prospects” on February 12\, 2014. \nProgramme\n1000h – 1040h Inaugural Session\n1000h-1005h Opening Remarks by Dr. Arvind Gupta\, DG\, IDSA \n1005h-1020h Keynote Address by Mrs. Sujatha Singh\, Foreign Secretary\, GOI \nSpeakers \n1020h-1025h Amb Paulo Roberto Tarrisse da Fontoura\, Head\, IO Division\, Brazil (tbc)\n1025h-1030h Ms. Ina Lepel\, DDG for Global Issues\, Germany\n1030h-1035h Mr Yutaka Arima\, Director\, United Nations Policy Division\, Foreign Policy Affairs Bureau\, Japan\n1035h-1040h Mr Navtej Sarna\, SS (IO)\, MEA\, India \n1040h – 1100h Tea \n1100h – 1230h Session I: Perspectives on Reform\nThe first session will focus on the challenges in expansion of the UNSC\, the role of the P-5 and other groupings\, the use of veto and effectiveness of the UNSC\nModerator: Dr. Arvind Gupta\, DG\, IDSA\nSpeakers (15 minutes each)\n-Amb Prakash Shah\, Former PR\, PMI\, New York\n-Prof CSR Murthy\, School of International Studies\, JNU\n-Prof Varun Sahni\, School of International Studies\, JNU\nDiscussion \n1230h – 1330h Lunch \n1330h – 1530h Session II: The Way Forward: Achieving UNSC Reform by 2015\nThe second session will focus on the on-going processes for UN Security Council Reform\, such as G-4 interaction with the L69 and other groups\, intergovernmental and text based negotiations and outreach to Africa.\nModerator : Mr. Navtej Sarna\, SS (IO)\, MEA\nSpeakers (15 minutes each)\n-Amb Hardeep Puri\, Former PR\, PMI\, New York\n-Amb BS Prakash\, Former Ambassador\, Embassy of India\, Brazil\n-Ms Ruchita Beri\, Senior Research Associate\, IDSA\nDiscussion \n1530h-1545h Tea \n1545h-1615h Session III: India and the UN\nThe third session will focus on the contributions that India has made to the UN multilateral system\, in both the spheres of development and peace and security.\nModerator: Shri. Vikas Swarup\, JS (UNP)\, MEA\nSpeakers (15 minutes each)\n-Prof SD Muni\, Distinguished Fellow\, IDSA\, Former Ambassador to Lao PDR\n-Lt Gen (Retd.) Satish Nambiar\, Distinguished Fellow\, IDSA\nDiscussion \nDownload Programme [PDF] \nComplete text of Keynote Address by Mrs. Sujatha Singh\, Foreign Secretary\, GOI \nConference Publication \nPress Release \nPhotographs
URL:https://idsa.in/idsa-event/united-nations-security-council-reform-perspectives-and-prospects
CATEGORIES:CONFERENCES
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://idsa.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/no_photo-200x150-2.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20140219T053000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20140221T053000
DTSTAMP:20261104T194703
CREATED:20231223T125534Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250309T041528Z
UID:62776-1392787800-1392960600@idsa.in
SUMMARY:16th Asian Security Conference: Emerging Strategic Trends in Asia and India’s Response
DESCRIPTION:Concept Note\n\n\nThere is little doubt that Asia –  stretching from the Eurasian landmass to the maritime reaches of Australia and  the South Pacific – is experiencing a major shift in the global balance of  power. Expressions like the ‘Indo-Pacific’ and ‘Asia-Pacific’\, contested they  maybe\, capture Asia’s expanse and dynamism. But for one brief and dramatic  financial crisis in 1997\, growth rates in Asia have been averaging well above  the rest of the world. The rise of China along with the increasing global  footprint of Russia and India in G20 and the ASEAN states soaring economies  have made Asia the powerhouse and centre of gravity. Yet\, Asia struggles with  numerous conflicts in spite of its ‘alphabet soup’ of regional organisations  and security structures. \n      Changes are happening fast in Asia  and changing not only the geo-political landscape but also the mindset of the  people who are pushing for political reforms and accountability. The global  power shifts being witnessed is also potentially prising up Asia to  confrontation as well as convergence as states compete. China is an important  piece of the puzzle and its rise is a defining line of the changing landscape.  How will China define its national interest in the future? Will it pursue an  assertive\, even aggressive policy in Asia to back up its territorial claims? Or  will China\, assured of its great power status practice moderation and  restraint? Importantly\, how should India and other key states in Asia respond  to China’s continuous rise and influence – should the response be as a  strategic competitor with a policy of confrontation or a containment approach  through active cooperation?  \n      From a strategic grand view\, the balance  of power is uncertain in Asia. A sizeable US military presence continues and  the Obama administration´s policy involves strengthening US military alliance  and strategic partnerships and simultaneously repositioning forces. China would  be far from assured that the ‘rebalancing’ is not directed towards it thus  opening up the region to power play and rivalry in the East China Sea and South  China Sea. A resultant increase in military expenditure and modernisation and a  thrust towards new technologies will spur many countries. \n      The numerous stress-lines and  fault-lines expose Asia to many potential flash-points. Unresolved territorial  issues stand between India and China\, Vietnam and China\, China and Russia\,  Russia and Japan. North Korea and Taiwan may trigger-off unmanageable crises.  West Asia continues to be restive threatening to tear apart the socio-political  fabric. Of the four Asian nuclear powers\, North Korea and Pakistan are highly  suspect nuclear proliferators involved in covert supply of missile technology.  The China-Japan rivalry reveals dangerous chauvinism. At the same time\, the two  largest populated countries – China and India – referred to as ‘planetary  powers’ surging need for energy and raw materials for its 2.5 billion people  creates new areas of resource friction. Resource scarcity will not only be  related to physical shortage but more possibly from failure of governance.  \n      Asia’s  economies are increasingly vital to each other and to the world with both the  US and Europe continuing to post low GDP growth. The economic shift is shaping two different approaches to trade liberalization in Asia. One  paved by the ASEAN-led Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and  the other by the US-led Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and it has to be seen  how these approaches will determine the economic choices in the coming years. While\,  at one level\, certain investment and trade barriers will continue to hinder business  in Asia\, at another\, poverty eradication will have to remain an essence of  economic growth for Asian countries. The economies in Asia have to continuously  grow fast along with being sustainable and inclusive. Other challenges that  equally impact the economy are an increased number of natural disasters that  interrupt the supply chain\, security concerns emanating from terrorism and  cyber security\, where hacking\, espionage and lack of privacy fuel concerns for  companies as well as politicians and governments.  \n      For India\, the emerging geopolitical  and geo-economic trends raise questions as to how it will lock into the new  continental power matrix and how it will respond and reappraise to the changes.  \n      Asia is on the threshold of change —  the known and unknown; opportunities and uncertainties abound. Such times also  offer an excellent chance to concentrate on the dynamics of change\, to search  for new ways of understanding\, and to prepare for a future that is certainly  set to surprise.  \n      Against this  backdrop\, the 16th annual Asian Security Conference (ASC) to be held at the  Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses\, New Delhi\, in February 2014 will  deliberate the emerging strategic trends in Asia and unravel the challenges and opportunities. \nDay One\n      Session1: Asia’s Geopolitical Future\n      Central to the future of stability in Asia is how the  rise of China  is impacting the balance of power. China is now strong enough to challenge US’  leadership in Asia. But it is not clear as to what kind of new order would  emerge. One possibility is a contested order framed by US and China strategic  rivalry. The Chinese dominance might push other Asian powers into alliance with  US making the landscape polarized. On the other hand\, the US stays engaged in  Asia\, without being assertive and allowing for a ‘concert of powers’ as a  counter weight to China’s power in the Indo-Pacific. Regional  institutions are important prescription for bolstering Asia’s stability but  raises doubts on whether such multilateral structures have the capability to  absorb the shocks and resolve conflicts. This session will explore  Asia’s geopolitical future\, the various scenarios that might emerge and the  conditions for stability. \n      Session 2: Military Trends in Asia \n      While Asia has seen a growth of regional institutions yet\, Asian  countries’ military expenditures tell a tale of escalating security competition  and the recent claims in South China Sea  suggest that regional mechanisms don’t necessarily lower the temperature.  China’s military budget accounts for nearly half of all the military spending  in the region. Japan\, on the other hand\, has increased its defence spending\,  partly as a reality check to China and partly as a response to US defence cuts.  Many of the US allies in Asia under US protection will have to accept more  risks and boost their military capabilities. How will the Asian countries  military modernisation impact the region? What are the perceived external  threats and how is it impacting the military doctrines? What implications does  the military expenditure have on future force structure and strategic  posturing? \n        Session 3: Economic Global Shift  towards Asia\n        The world’s economic centre of gravity has shifted to  Asia with the rapid economic development seen in  China\, India and other Asian countries along with the  economic problems experienced in Europe and the US. Urbanization will be a  key trend of the rapidly growing economies in  Asia. The global economic shift is bringing forth opportunities and challenges.  What are the responses of key economic and political  institutions in Asia\, particularly in India and China? Should India follow  China´s example and turn its attention towards boosting domestic consumption  rather than foreign trade? Questions about how the old developed economies (the  West) will react and whether Asia’s current economic model is sustainable will  equally emerge. Will there be a slowing with major adjustments or a collapse?  What levels of impact will the changing demography particularly the growing  middle class and the aging population have on the economy? This session will  examine how the changes will shape the economic and business contours in Asia? \n        Day  2\n      Session 4: Resource Stress in Asia\n        One of Asia’s  major concerns centres on resource security. Food\, energy\, water and climate  are intricately linked and further impacted by price\, availability and quality.  Population growth\, urbanization\, and industrialization are exacerbating  resource-related stresses. Asia includes about 56 per cent of world’s  population and depends on 31 per cent of arable land and by 2030 the continent  will have 5 billion people. Understanding the resource dynamics is useful to the political economy  particularly as competition for natural  resources among Asian nations intensifies. Will it bring the continent to a  dangerous crossroads of dependence\, geopolitical tension and environmental  degradation? What trade-offs and at what appropriate scale (regional\,  national\, sub-national) will be required to ease resource pressure? Is the  framing of resource policies particularly complementary to rights-based  development approaches?  \n      Session 5: Ocean Governance in the  Indo-Pacific\n        With the economic power shift to Asia\,  the Indo-Pacific region is fast becoming the centre of trade\, investment and  cooperation. The region contains close to half the world’s population and  provides several of the world’s most important choke-points for global commerce  including the Strait of Malacca. Clearly the region is recognised for its  economic dynamism and geo-strategic importance. Many inter-state disputes are  maritime in nature\, both due to the many unsettled maritime boundaries as a  consequence of the enactment of UNCLOS\, and the tendency towards unrestrained  exploitation of maritime resources with little regard for territorial  jurisdictions. A legal framework and multilateral agreements are critical in managing  communal global resources such as the high seas but fear of regional hegemony is likely to hinder support for the  establishment of ocean governance\, particularly among the weaker countries. The  session will discuss the legal obligations\, impact of institutional  arrangements and strengthening governance over maritime resources.   \n      Session 6: Assessing Risks:  Cyber and Critical Infrastructure\n        In  today’s interconnected world\, states share risks and vulnerabilities. Some of  the biggest security challenges will come from the cyber space. Singapore and  Indonesia have already taken steps towards setting up cyber commands. As  cyber-attacks and hacktivism increase\, challenges to information sharing will  mount. Against this backdrop\, how then will governments and policing bodies  cooperate on law enforcement and sharing information? Policies  towards preventions\, precautions and preparedness plans will be examined. The  session will also explore critical infrastructure protection and  government coordination highlighting in particular the increased reliance upon  technology systems in public and private infrastructure and hence vulnerability  to new forms of cyberterrorism and attacks. The lens will also shift to civil-military  cooperation and how ‘calling out the troops’ to combat emergencies occurs in  countries.  \nDay  3\n      Session 7: India’s ResponsePanel Discussion\n      The big question is how India is responding to the strategic  changes in Asia? China sits atop the power pyramid with its physical size\,  military capability and economic clout that combines to assert regional  dominance. Powers like India would not like to easily cede the hegemonic space  to China but\, at the same time\, would realise that its power is pervasive and  difficult to counter balance. The arrangement possibly would be for India to  trade and invest intensely with China while seeking a security alliance with  the US. Will India follow this path? How is India as an emerging power looked  at in the region? Can India be a guarantor/balancer or will it be seen as an  opponent? A careful reappraisal of Asia’s emerging strategic dynamics\, a  hard-headed assessment of what India’s interests are and a considered approach  to fulfilling these interests should deeply engage academia and policy makers.  The session will explore the pillars on which India can build a more  comprehensive\, forward-looking and proactive Asia policy.  \n\n\n\n\nProgramme Schedule\n\n\n\n\n\nDay 1: February 19\n\n\n\n10.00-10.35\nInaugural Session\n\n\n10.00-10.05\nWelcome Address by DG\, IDSA\n\n\n\n\n\n\n10.05-10.30\nAddress by the Hon’ble Governor of West Bengal\n\n\n10.30-10.35\nVote of Thanks\n\n\n \n \n\n\n10.35-11.00\nTea\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n11.00-13.00\nSession 1: Asia’s    geopolitical future\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \nChairperson: Arvind Gupta \nYan Xuetong : The bipolarization in East Asia\nSujit Dutta: Asia’s power transition: uncertain future of stability and peace\nTakenori Horimoto: How is power transition in Asia taking place?\nMichael Wesley: Restless giants: Asia’s new geopolitics\n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n13.00-14.00\nLunch\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n14.00-16.00\nSession 2: Military trends    in Asia\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \nChairperson: Satish Nambiar \nFumio Ota: Chinese military expansion and other Asian states’ reaction\nAndrew Scobell: What is driving Asian aircraft carrier programs? The case of China\nNguyen Hung Son: Vietnam naval modernisation: causes and trends\nPrakash Menon: India’s military – modernising not militarising\n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n16.00-16.15\nTea\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n16.15-16:45\nSpecial Address by Hon’ble Defence Minister\n\n\n \n \n\n\n16.45-18.30\nSession 3: Economic global    shift to Asia\n\n\n \nChairperson: US Bhatia \nHu Shisheng: Economic global shift toward Asia: realities and challenges\nRajat Kathuria: China and India: the benefits of co-opetition\nKristy Hsu: Opportunities and challenges in China and India: Taiwanese investors’ perspectives \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\nDay 2: February 20\n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n10.00-10.30\nTea\n\n\n \n \n\n\n10.30-13.00\nSession 4 Resource Stress    in Asia\n\n\n \nChairperson: Uttam Sinha  \nBobby A. Tamaela Wattimena: Energy security challenges under limited resource pressure in Asia region\nMukul Sanwal: Why water politics matters\nHuang Ying: Urbanisation and water security in China\nYashika Singh: India’s resource economy: possible choices and probable outcomes\n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n13.00-14.00\nLunch\n\n\n \n \n\n\n14.00-16.00\nSession 5: Ocean Governance    in Indo-Pacific\n\n\n \nChairperson: Sudhir Vyas \nKV Bhagirath: The geo-strategic importance of the Indian Ocean\nYou Ji: Meeting the challenge of a la carte maritime disorder in the Indo-Pacific region\nLan-Anh T Nguyen: The quest for effective ocean management in the South China Sea\nAnup Singh: Time to discipline the sea lawyers\n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n16.00-16.15\nTea\n\n\n \n \n\n\n16.15-18.00\nSession 6: Assessing Risks:    Cyber and Critical Infrastructure\n\n\n \nChairperson: Nehchal Sandhu \nGulshan Rai: Cyber security threat and states’ initiatives for securing cyber space\nTimothy Legrand & Saskia Hufnagel: Risk and resilience: international approaches to vulnerable infrastructure protection\nSimon Bronitt & Ashutosh Misra: Use of lethal force and military aid to civil power Australia and India: sharing lessons in counter-terrorism\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\nDay 3: February 21 \n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n10.00-10.45\nSpecial Address by the National Security Advisor (NSA)\n\n\n \n \n\n\n10.45-11.00\nTea\n\n\n \n \n\n\n11.00-13.00\nSession 7: India’s Response: A Panel Discussion \nPatrick Suckling \nSD Muni\nYan Xuetong        \nP Stobdan \nRajiv Nayan\nSrikanth Kondapalli        \nTakenori Horimoto        \nNguyen Hung Son\n\n\n\n \n \n\n\n13.00-14.00\nLunch\n\n\n\n\n\n\nConference Booklet\nRapporteurs Report
URL:https://idsa.in/idsa-event/16th-asian-security-conference-emerging-strategic-trends-in-asia-and-indias-response
CATEGORIES:Asian Security Conference,Previous ASC,CONFERENCES
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://idsa.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/no_photo-200x150-2.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20140225T053000
DTEND;TZID=Asia/Kolkata:20140226T053000
DTSTAMP:20261104T194703
CREATED:20231223T125534Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250308T084600Z
UID:62775-1393306200-1393392600@idsa.in
SUMMARY:Identification of Effective Implementation Practices by Examining UNSCR 1540 (2004) After a Decade of its Existence
DESCRIPTION:This workshop is being held in the framework of the 10th anniversary of the adoption of 1540 to both better understand the resolution’s implementation and to identify effective practices for the implementation of the resolution going forward. The primary participants in the event will be members of civil society who have identified effective practices. The audience will also include officials positioned to adopt or enact these effective practices. The event is hosted by the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses\, Institute for Strategic Studies\, King’s College London (Project Alpha) and the UN Office of Disarmament affairs.  \nBackground\nWhen the UN Security Council adopted resolution 1540 on 28 April 2004\, expectations for its effective implementation were low. The resolution was intended to assist those States that were willing to support the goals of the resolution but which lacked the legal basis through which to do so. The UNSCR 1540 Committee was set up to help Member States\, and other stakeholders\, to implement the resolution. The UN Security Council subsequently extended the mandate of the 1540 Committee three times. Most recently\, on April 2011\, the mandate of the committee was extended for a period of ten years to 2021. The key challenges to overcome during this longer mandate are those surrounding effective implementation of the resolutions requirements.  \nUNSCR 1540 has many achievements to its credit. In the decade since 1540’s adoption\, progress has been realised in expanding the geographical coverage of certain elements of the resolutions requirements and in improving the level of implementation in individual states. Under the auspices of UNSCR 1540 the legislative framework of numerous countries has been improved. Countries such as Malaysia have\, for the first time\, adopted trade control acts while many others have improved specific aspects of their legal system.  \nThe UNSCR 1540 committee has been instrumental in enabling the improved legal adherence to the resolution’s requirements. Through its work the 1540 Committee has also helped to establish 1540 as a framework for cooperation amongst States\, civil society and non-state actors alike in ensuring that the balance between security and prosperity is maintained. Several member countries spread over different geographical regions have received technical assistance to create or strengthen national control and security structures. For this purpose\, the Committee and member states have involved relevant international\, regional and sub-regional organizations.  \nHowever\, the success of UNSCR 1540 as an instrument to strengthen legal frameworks has led directly to a new need for the implementation of national legislation to be improved. The adoption of laws cannot alone deliver upon the objectives of 1540. The challenge for the international community\, therefore\, in the second decade since the resolution’s adoption is to match the improvements in legal basis with improvements in implementation.  It is in this context that there is a need to identify effective practices.  \nObjectives of the Workshop:\n\nThe main workshop objective is to identify effective practices that could provide solutions to the implementation challenges of 1540’s export control provisions.  \nThe workshop will also provide some insights into the geographical implementation of Resolution 1540. \nThe other purpose of the workshop is to analyse the challenges and opportunities faced by the UNSCR 1540 Committee in supporting implementation (as opposed to supporting the development of legislative frameworks).  \n\nProgramme\nDay 1\n08:30-09:30: Registration 			 \n09.30-10.30: Inaugural Session>\nChair: Arvind Gupta \n\nWelcome Remarks by the Organisers (IDSA\, King’s College London and Institute for Strategic Studies\, Delhi)\nIntroductory Remarks by Francois Coutu\, Political Affairs Officer\, UN Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA)\nInaugural Address by Amandeep Singh Gill\, Joint Secretary\, Ministry of External Affairs\, Government of India\n\n10.45-11.00			Tea/Coffee Break  \n11.00-12:15	Session I: An Overview of a Decade of Existence of the UNSCR 1540 from Regional Perspectives: What progress has been realized and what still needs to be done. \nChair: Matthew Harries \n\nExperience from EU – Cindy Vestergaard\, Senior Researcher Danish Institute of International Studies\, Copenhagen\, Denmark  [Presentation]\nExperience from Asia-Pacific – Heigo Sato\, Professor\, Institute of World Studies\, Takushoku University\, Japan [Presentation]\nExperience from Central Asia – Timur Cherikov\, Centre for Non-proliferation and Export Control\, Bishkek\, Kyrgyz Republic [Presentation]\n\n12.15 –13:30	Session II: An Overview of a Decade of Existence of the UNSCR 1540 from Regional Perspectives: What progress has been realized and what still needs to be done.\nChair: Ochieng Adala  \n\nAfrican Experience: Gillane Allam\, Egyptian Council for Foreign Affairs\, Cairo\, Egypt\nLatin American Experience: Kai Ilchmann\, Visiting Fellow at Science and Technology Policy Research\, University of Sussex  [Presentation]\nResolution 1540 in the Arab Region: Ayman Khalil\, Director\, Arab Institute for Security Studies\, Amman\, Jordan\n\n13:30-14:30			Lunch \n14.30-16:00 	Session III: Effective Practices in the Licensing Process: Lessons on Implementation\nChair: G Balachandran  \n\nThe Indian Experience: S K Samal\, Joint Director General of Foreign Trade (DGFT)\, Government of India\, New Delhi\, India   [Presentation]\nCatchalls and End-Use Controls: Ian Stewart\, Head\, Project Alpha\, Kings College\, London\, UK  [Presentation]\nOpen Source and The Importance of Sharing Refusals: Matjaz Murovec\, General Customs Directorate\, Republic of Slovenia  [Presentation]\nSouth Korean Experience: Steve Ho Kang\, Director\, Security Management Institute and Korea Association of Security and Trade (KAST)\, Republic of Korea [Presentation]\n\n16.00-16.15 			Tea/Coffee Break \n16:15-17:30			Session IV: Enforcement: Challenges Ahead\nChair: D P Dash \n\nThe Indian Experience: Arvind Madhvan\, Director\, Disarmament and International Security Affairs (DISA)\, Ministry of External Affairs\, India  [Presentation]\nEffective Practices in Policing Transit and Transhipment: Janet Baenke\, BAFA\, Germany [Presentation]\nTechnological Best Practices: Anshuman Roy\, Rhombus Power\, USA  [Presentation]\n\n17:30-18:00			Review of Effective Practices Identified on Day One. \nDay-2\n09:30-11:00	Session V: Industry Engagement\nChair: Michael Aho  \n\nEnhancing Industry Capacity for Compliance: Anupam Srivastava\, Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI)\, New Delhi\, India  [Presentation]\nThe Private Sector as a Non-Proliferation Asset: Wyn Bowen\, King’s College\, London\, UK\nIndustry Engagement through Industry Associations: Mukesh Bhargava\, Head of Marine Business\, Larsen &Toubro\, India\n\n11:00-11.15			Tea/Coffee Break \n11:15-12:45	Session VI: Effective Practices in Coordination: A Role of NGO’s\nChair: C Uday Bhaskar  \n\nMaria Sultan\, Director-General of the South Asian Strategic Stability Institute\, Islamabad\, Pakistan  [Presentation]\nSharing Best Practices Through Regional Forums – Tanya Ogilvie-White\, Centre for Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament\, The Australian National University\, Australia  [Presentation]\nRajiv Nayan\, Senior Research Associate\, Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses\, New Delhi\, India [Presentation]\n\n12:45-13:30	Lunch	 \n13:30-15:00	Session VII: Effective Practices and Intangible Controls\nChair: Prof. Wyn Bowen \n\nCodes of Conduct\, Daniel Salisbury\, Project Alpha\, Kings College\, London\, UK [Presentation]\nEffective Practices for Controlling Intangible Technology Exports: Peter Clevestig\, SIPRI\, Sweden [Presentation]\nR Ramachandran\, Former Editor\, Frontline Magazine  [Presentation]  \n\n15:00-15:15			Tea/Coffee Break \n15:15-16:30	Session VIII: Identification of Effective Practices Next Steps\nChair: B M Gokhale  \n\nA B Awati\, Scientist\, Department of Atomic Energy\, Mumbai\, India  [Presentation]\nEmiliano Buis\, Professor and Researcher at NPS Global Foundation\, Buenos Aires\, Argentina [Presentation]\nMargaret Muturi\, Department of Medical Laboratory Science\, Kenyatta University\, Kenya [Presentation]\nNoel Stott (Via Skype)\, Senior Research Fellow\, ISS Africa.    \n\n16:30-17:00	Closing Session\nChair: Arvind Gupta \n\nRajiv Nayan\, Senior Research Associate\, Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses\, New Delhi\, India \nIan Stewart\, Head\, Project Alpha\, Kings College\, London\, UK  \nMichael C. Aho\, UNSC 1540 Committee Member\, Coordinator\, Working Group on Transparency and Media Outreach\nG Balachandran\, Consulting Fellow\, Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses\, New Delhi\, India \n\nClick here for Event Photographs [+]
URL:https://idsa.in/idsa-event/identification-of-effective-implementation-practices-by-examining-unscr-1540-2004-after-a-decade-of-its-existence
CATEGORIES:CONFERENCES
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://idsa.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/no_photo-200x150-2.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR