Chair: Sudhir Devare
Discussants: Baladas Ghoshal and C. S. Kuppuswamy
The major argument of the paper was that the government’s stance with regard to constraining religious assertion in Malaysia has been biased against non-Muslims. The government and society are carefully balancing their economic and religious interests, so that the situation does not get worse. The internal security act has helped in constraining the influx of rigid religious assertion, but the subdued disposition of civil courts and predominance of Shariah courts has created dissent among Christians, Buddhists and Hindus. Economic development has led to the projection of Malaysia as one of the model states of development, but religious assertion by the majority has created rifts within society. The emergence of a strong opposition and the probable change in leadership of the ruling coalition would mean that religion would become a more important factor in the coming years. Within Malaysian Society there has been awareness that increasing Islamisation or religious assertion threatening social religious harmony would not augur well for the future, but religious issues have not been adequately addressed so far and neither has inter-faith dialogue been promoted. While the current situation is not alarming, the future role of religious groups as well as political parties would determine whether Malaysia would stay on course as an economic power in the region or be derailed by religious polarisation. The constraints imposed by the state are working but there are strong indications of religious assertion having proliferated in society.
Ambassador Sudhir Devare chaired the seminar. Prof. Baladas Ghoshala and Shri S.C.S. Kuppuswamy were the external discussants; and Alok R. Mukhopadhyay and Udai Bhanu Singh were the internal discussants. The following points were raised during the discussion:
Prepared by Gunjan Singh, Research Assistant at the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, New Delhi